These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38532229)

  • 1. A Model Implied Instrumental Variable Approach to Exploratory Factor Analysis (MIIV-EFA).
    Bollen KA; Gates KM; Luo L
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):687-716. PubMed ID: 38532229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables.
    Jin S; Yang-Wallentin F; Bollen KA
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):564-594. PubMed ID: 34097200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model Implied Instrumental Variables (MIIVs): An Alternative Orientation to Structural Equation Modeling.
    Bollen KA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 30222004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model-implied instrumental variable-generalized method of moments (MIIV-GMM) estimators for latent variable models.
    Bollen KA; Kolenikov S; Bauldry S
    Psychometrika; 2014 Jan; 79(1):20-50. PubMed ID: 24532165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An introduction to model implied instrumental variables using two stage least squares (MIIV-2SLS) in structural equation models (SEMs).
    Bollen KA; Fisher ZF; Giordano ML; Lilly AG; Luo L; Ye A
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; 27(5):752-772. PubMed ID: 34323584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Instrumental Variable Estimator for Mixed Indicators: Analytic Derivatives and Alternative Parameterizations.
    Fisher ZF; Bollen KA
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):660-683. PubMed ID: 32833145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ROBUSTNESS CONDITIONS FOR MIIV-2SLS WHEN THE LATENT VARIABLE OR MEASUREMENT MODEL IS STRUCTURALLY MISSPECIFIED.
    Bollen KA; Gates KM; Fisher Z
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2018; 25(6):848-859. PubMed ID: 30573943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing estimators for latent interaction models under structural and distributional misspecifications.
    Brandt H; Umbach N; Kelava A; Bollen KA
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):321-345. PubMed ID: 31670539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Samples and Missing Data.
    McNeish D
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(6):637-652. PubMed ID: 27929657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rotating Factors to Simplify Their Structural Paths.
    Zhang G; Hattori M; Trichtinger LA
    Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):865-887. PubMed ID: 35867178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.
    Marsh HW; Lüdtke O; Muthén B; Asparouhov T; Morin AJ; Trautwein U; Nagengast B
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):471-91. PubMed ID: 20822261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating and Testing Random Intercept Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Model Implied Instrumental Variables.
    Giordano ML; Bollen KA; Jin S
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2022; 29(4):584-599. PubMed ID: 37333803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing Interpretability in Factor Analysis by Means of Mathematical Optimization.
    Carrizosa E; Guerrero V; Romero Morales D; Satorra A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(5):748-762. PubMed ID: 31663785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Latent variable GIMME using model implied instrumental variables (MIIVs).
    Gates KM; Fisher ZF; Bollen KA
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):227-242. PubMed ID: 31246041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Network analysis in psychiatric research.
    Ramos-Vera C; Serpa A
    Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2021 May; 49(3):123-124. PubMed ID: 33969473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Path and Direction Discovery in Individual Dynamic Factor Models: A Regularized Hybrid Unified Structural Equation Modeling with Latent Variable.
    Ye A; Bollen KA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(5):1019-1042. PubMed ID: 39058418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes: a comparison of three approaches.
    Jung S
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jul; 97():90-5. PubMed ID: 23541772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests.
    Canivez GL; McGill RJ; Dombrowski SC; Watkins MW; Pritchard AE; Jacobson LA
    Assessment; 2020 Mar; 27(2):274-296. PubMed ID: 30516059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting polychoric instrumental variables in confirmatory factor analysis: An alternative specification test and effects of instrumental variables.
    Jin S; Cao C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):387-413. PubMed ID: 29323415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.