These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38533075)

  • 1. A stimulus exposure of 50 ms elicits the uncanny valley effect.
    Yam J; Gong T; Xu H
    Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(6):e27977. PubMed ID: 38533075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Walking in the uncanny valley: importance of the attractiveness on the acceptance of a robot as a working partner.
    Destephe M; Brandao M; Kishi T; Zecca M; Hashimoto K; Takanishi A
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():204. PubMed ID: 25762967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrepancies in perceived humanness between spatially filtered and unfiltered faces and their associations with uncanny feelings.
    Ito M; Suzuki A
    Perception; 2024 Aug; 53(8):529-543. PubMed ID: 38752230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human Perception of Animacy in Light of the Uncanny Valley Phenomenon.
    Wang S; Rochat P
    Perception; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1386-1411. PubMed ID: 28758537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pupillary Responses to Robotic and Human Emotions: The Uncanny Valley and Media Equation Confirmed.
    Reuten A; van Dam M; Naber M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():774. PubMed ID: 29875722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Creepy cats and strange high houses: Support for configural processing in testing predictions of nine uncanny valley theories.
    Diel A; MacDorman KF
    J Vis; 2021 Apr; 21(4):1. PubMed ID: 33792617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding the Uncanny: Both Atypical Features and Category Ambiguity Provoke Aversion toward Humanlike Robots.
    Strait MK; Floerke VA; Ju W; Maddox K; Remedios JD; Jung MF; Urry HL
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1366. PubMed ID: 28912736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Familiar faces rendered strange: Why inconsistent realism drives characters into the uncanny valley.
    Chattopadhyay D; MacDorman KF
    J Vis; 2016 Sep; 16(11):7. PubMed ID: 27611063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The perception of humanness from the movements of synthetic agents.
    Thompson JC; Trafton JG; McKnight P
    Perception; 2011; 40(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 21936298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Uncanny Valley Phenomenon and the Temporal Dynamics of Face Animacy Perception.
    Wang S; Cheong YF; Dilks DD; Rochat P
    Perception; 2020 Oct; 49(10):1069-1089. PubMed ID: 32903162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A reappraisal of the uncanny valley: categorical perception or frequency-based sensitization?
    Burleigh TJ; Schoenherr JR
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1488. PubMed ID: 25653623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness.
    Kätsyri J; Förger K; Mäkäräinen M; Takala T
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():390. PubMed ID: 25914661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the uncanny valley for prosthetic hands.
    Poliakoff E; O'Kane S; Carefoot O; Kyberd P; Gowen E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 29412089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Circling Around the Uncanny Valley: Design Principles for Research Into the Relation Between Human Likeness and Eeriness.
    Lay S; Brace N; Pike G; Pollick F
    Iperception; 2016; 7(6):2041669516681309. PubMed ID: 27994844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infants prefer the faces of strangers or mothers to morphed faces: an uncanny valley between social novelty and familiarity.
    Matsuda YT; Okamoto Y; Ida M; Okanoya K; Myowa-Yamakoshi M
    Biol Lett; 2012 Oct; 8(5):725-8. PubMed ID: 22696289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The inversion effect on the cubic humanness-uncanniness relation in humanlike agents.
    Diel A; Sato W; Hsu CT; Minato T
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1222279. PubMed ID: 37705949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Persistence of the uncanny valley: the influence of repeated interactions and a robot's attitude on its perception.
    Złotowski JA; Sumioka H; Nishio S; Glas DF; Bartneck C; Ishiguro H
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():883. PubMed ID: 26175702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monkey visual attention does not fall into the uncanny valley.
    Carp SB; Santistevan AC; Machado CJ; Whitaker AM; Aguilar BL; Bliss-Moreau E
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11760. PubMed ID: 35817791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces.
    MacDorman KF; Green RD; Ho CC; Koch CT
    Comput Human Behav; 2009 May; 25(3):695-710. PubMed ID: 25506126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is it the real deal? Perception of virtual characters versus humans: an affective cognitive neuroscience perspective.
    de Borst AW; de Gelder B
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():576. PubMed ID: 26029133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.