These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38533420)

  • 21. It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.
    Snefjella B; Kuperman V
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():135-146. PubMed ID: 27567162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
    Kliegl R; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 16478314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patients with Mild Alzheimer's Disease Fail When Using Their Working Memory: Evidence from the Eye Tracking Technique.
    Fernández G; Manes F; Politi LE; Orozco D; Schumacher M; Castro L; Agamennoni O; Rotstein NP
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 50(3):827-38. PubMed ID: 26836011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lexical Frequency and Sentence Context Influence the Brain's Response to Single Words.
    Huizeling E; Arana S; Hagoort P; Schoffelen JM
    Neurobiol Lang (Camb); 2022; 3(1):149-179. PubMed ID: 37215333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
    Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unseen but influential associates: Properties of words' associates influence lexical and semantic processing.
    Muraki EJ; Pexman PM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38459396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading.
    Amenta S; Marelli M; Crepaldi D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1587-96. PubMed ID: 25664370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CONcreTEXT norms: Concreteness ratings for Italian and English words in context.
    Montefinese M; Gregori L; Ravelli AA; Varvara R; Radicioni DP
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0293031. PubMed ID: 37862357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction at the intersection of sentence context and word form: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading.
    Amenta S; Hasenäcker J; Crepaldi D; Marelli M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):1081-1092. PubMed ID: 36510092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semantic similarity, predictability, and models of sentence processing.
    Roland D; Yun H; Koenig JP; Mauner G
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 22197059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
    Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How fast can predictability influence word skipping during reading?
    Fitzsimmons G; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1054-63. PubMed ID: 23244054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading.
    White SJ; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 16235630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Linked linear mixed models: A joint analysis of fixation locations and fixation durations in natural reading.
    Hohenstein S; Matuschek H; Kliegl R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):637-651. PubMed ID: 27612862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1155():147-62. PubMed ID: 17499223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Word skipping: Effects of word length, predictability, spelling and reading skill.
    Slattery TJ; Yates M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jan; 71(1):250-259. PubMed ID: 28856970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.