These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38534274)

  • 1. Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques.
    Wigler R; Srour Y; Wilchfort Y; Metzger Z; Kfir A
    Dent J (Basel); 2024 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38534274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of Different Irrigant Activation Systems on Debris and Smear Layer Removal: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation.
    Wigler R; Herteanu M; Wilchfort Y; Kfir A
    Int J Dent; 2023; 2023():9933524. PubMed ID: 37771362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation.
    Haupt F; Meinel M; Gunawardana A; Hülsmann M
    Aust Endod J; 2020 Apr; 46(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 30907051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
    Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM).
    Andreani Y; Gad BT; Cocks TC; Harrison J; Keresztes ME; Pomfret JK; Rees EB; Ma D; Baloun BL; Rahimi M
    Aust Endod J; 2021 Aug; 47(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 33682268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
    Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Debris and smear removal in flattened root canals after use of different irrigant agitation protocols.
    Ribeiro EM; Silva-Sousa YT; Souza-Gabriel AE; Sousa-Neto MD; Lorencetti KT; Silva SR
    Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Jun; 75(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 22131294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Filling Debris and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy Using Various Root Canal Activation Systems during Endodontic Retreatment.
    Park SY; Kang MK; Choi HW; Shon WJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Nov; 56(11):. PubMed ID: 33207656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of Different Irrigant Activation Systems on Smear Layer Removal: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.
    Miguéns-Vila R; Martín-Biedma B; Aboy-Pazos S; Uroz-Torres D; Álvarez-Nóvoa P; Dablanca-Blanco AB; Varela-Aneiros I; Castelo-Baz P
    J Clin Med; 2022 Feb; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 35207275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of different irrigant activation techniques for cleaning root canal anastomosis.
    Montaser OK; Fayyad DM; Abdelsalam N
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):142. PubMed ID: 36906530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Mandibular Second Molars: An
    Hachem CE; Nehme W; Kaloustian MK; Ghosn N; Daou M; Zogheib C; Karam M; Mhanna R; Macaluso V; Kharouf N; Chedid JCA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1173-1179. PubMed ID: 37073943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Continuous Chelation Irrigation Using DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl with or without High-power Sonic Activation on Debris and Smear Layer Removal.
    Aoun C; Rechenberg DK; Karam M; Mhanna R; Plotino G; Zogheib C
    Eur Endod J; 2023 Mar; 8(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 37010200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite.
    Plotino G; Colangeli M; Özyürek T; DeDeus G; Panzetta C; Castagnola R; Grande NM; Marigo L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jan; 25(1):237-245. PubMed ID: 32500405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal at the Apical One-Third of the Root Using Different Protocols of Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser.
    Habshi AY; Aga N; Habshi KY; Hassan MEM; Choudhry Z; Ahmed MA; Syed AUY; Jouhar R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(3):. PubMed ID: 36984434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic versus sonic activation of the final irrigant in root canals instrumented with rotary/reciprocating files: An in-vitro scanning electron microscopy analysis.
    Khalap ND; Kokate S; Hegde V
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 27563189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of four different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal in curved root canals : a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Ahuja P; Nandini S; Ballal S; Velmurugan N
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Jan; 11(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24910670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems.
    Blank-Gonçalves LM; Nabeshima CK; Martins GH; Machado ME
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1268-71. PubMed ID: 21846545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Debris and Smear Layer Removal from Oval Root Canals Comparing XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and Manual Irrigation: A SEM Evaluation.
    Alakshar A; Saleh ARM; Gorduysus MO
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Oct; 14(4):626-633. PubMed ID: 32777834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.