These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38535010)
1. Relationship between Bilateral Landmarks of Facial Asymmetry in Skeletal Class II and Class III in Vertical Dimension: 3D Facial Scan and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Jearanai T; Samruajbenjakun B; Chanmanee P Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38535010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of facial asymmetry in skeletal Class III malocclusion and its implications for treatment. Chen YJ; Yao CC; Chang ZC; Lai HH; Yeh KJ; Kok SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1533-1541. PubMed ID: 31235392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Facial asymmetry outcome of orthognathic surgery in mild craniofacial microsomia compared to non-syndromic class II asymmetry. Chen YF; Baan F; Bergé S; Liao YF; Maal T; Xi T Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Aug; 28(9):502. PubMed ID: 39196436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hard and Soft Tissue Asymmetry in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Tam TKM; Guo R; Liu H; Lin Y Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry. Li J; Liu Y; Ge X; Liu Z; Guan H; Wang L; Ma W Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):4973-4985. PubMed ID: 37417986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does maxillary yaw exist in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry? Noh HK; Park HS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):573-587. PubMed ID: 34332794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation analysis of three-dimensional changes of hard and soft tissues in class III orthognathic surgery patients using cone-beam computed tomography. Lee TY; Kim KH; Yu HS; Kim KD; Jung YS; Baik HS J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1530-40. PubMed ID: 25006925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Compensations in Subjects With Facial Asymmetry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): A Retrospective Study. Setvaji NR; Muthuswamy Pandian S Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52601. PubMed ID: 38374845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in Class III subjects. Part 1: a retrospective study evaluating postsurgical outcomes. Ajmera DH; Hsung RT; Singh P; Wong NSM; Yeung AWK; Lam WYH; Khambay BS; Leung YY; Gu M Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):4947-4966. PubMed ID: 35320382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facial asymmetry of the hard and soft tissues in skeletal Class I, II, and III patients. Li J; Wu S; Mei L; Wen J; Marra J; Lei L; Li H Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4966. PubMed ID: 38424179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of the three-dimensional skeletal variables with self-recognition of facial asymmetry in skeletal Class III patients. Lim SW; Jeon JB; Moon RJ; Oh S; Park A; Oh MH; Kim MS; Hwang HS; Cho JH Angle Orthod; 2022 Jul; 92(4):512-520. PubMed ID: 35166777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional analysis of lip soft tissue changes and related jaw changes in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry. Xu W; Tan H; Meng X; Ming Y; Wang T; Zheng L J Xray Sci Technol; 2021; 29(5):903-916. PubMed ID: 34151882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Skeletal Class III Facial Asymmetry by 3-Dimensional Surgical Simulation. Ko EW; Lin CH; Chen YA; Chen YR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 76(5):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 29031529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography. Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in facial soft tissue deviations in Class III patients with different types of mandibular asymmetry: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Kim HJ; Noh HK; Park HS Korean J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 53(6):402-419. PubMed ID: 37989577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of soft tissue prediction accuracy for orthognathic surgery with skeletal class III malocclusion using maxillofacial regional aesthetic units. Hou L; He Y; Yi B; Wang X; Liu X; Zhang Y; Li Z Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):173-182. PubMed ID: 36161529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential outcomes of jaw bone position after surgical-orthodontic treatment in three types of skeletal Class III asymmetry patients. Chen YJ; Tsai CY; Chang ZC; Yao CC; Kok SH J Formos Med Assoc; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38987030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in positions of cone-beam computed tomography landmarks in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry according to midsagittal planes. Noh HK; Kim HJ; Park HS Korean J Orthod; 2023 Jul; 53(4):219-231. PubMed ID: 37322899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A three-dimensional analysis of skeletal and dental characteristics in skeletal class III patients with facial asymmetry. Yu J; Hu Y; Huang M; Chen J; Ding X; Zheng L J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):449-462. PubMed ID: 29562577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Correlation between hard tissue and soft tissue landmarks. Economou S; Stoustrup P; Kristensen KD; Dalstra M; Küseler A; Herlin T; Pedersen TK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):662-672.e1. PubMed ID: 29706214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]