228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38535206)
1. Comparison of CRISPR-MAD7 and CRISPR-Cas9 for Gene Disruptions in
Smirnov K; Weiss F; Hatzl AM; Rieder L; Olesen K; Jensen S; Glieder A
J Fungi (Basel); 2024 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 38535206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genome editing in plants with MAD7 nuclease.
Lin Q; Zhu Z; Liu G; Sun C; Lin D; Xue C; Li S; Zhang D; Gao C; Wang Y; Qiu JL
J Genet Genomics; 2021 Jun; 48(6):444-451. PubMed ID: 34120856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expanding and understanding the CRISPR toolbox for Bacillus subtilis with MAD7 and dMAD7.
Price MA; Cruz R; Bryson J; Escalettes F; Rosser SJ
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2020 Jun; 117(6):1805-1816. PubMed ID: 32077487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expanding the CRISPR toolbox for Chinese hamster ovary cells with comprehensive tools for Mad7 genome editing.
Rojek JB; Basavaraju Y; Nallapareddy S; Bulté DB; Baumgartner R; Schoffelen S; Grav LM; Goletz S; Pedersen LE
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2023 Jun; 120(6):1478-1491. PubMed ID: 36864663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Targeted editing of transcriptional activator MXR1 on the Pichia pastoris genome using CRISPR/Cas9 technology.
Hou C; Yang Y; Xing Y; Zhan C; Liu G; Liu X; Liu C; Zhan J; Xu D; Bai Z
Yeast; 2020 Apr; 37(4):305-312. PubMed ID: 32050051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combinatorial optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 expression enables precision genome engineering in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris.
Weninger A; Hatzl AM; Schmid C; Vogl T; Glieder A
J Biotechnol; 2016 Oct; 235():139-49. PubMed ID: 27015975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ErCas12a CRISPR-MAD7 for Model Generation in Human Cells, Mice, and Rats.
Liu Z; Schiel JA; Maksimova E; Strezoska Ž; Zhao G; Anderson EM; Wu Y; Warren J; Bartels A; van Brabant Smith A; Lowe CE; Forbes KP
CRISPR J; 2020 Apr; 3(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 32315227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CRISPR/Cas9 Tool Kit for Efficient and Targeted Insertion/Deletion Mutagenesis of the Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris) Genome.
Fischer JE; Glieder A
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2513():121-133. PubMed ID: 35781203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Split-Marker System for CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing in Methylotrophic Yeasts.
Karginov AV; Tarutina MG; Lapteva AR; Pakhomova MD; Galliamov AA; Filkin SY; Fedorov AN; Agaphonov MO
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 May; 24(9):. PubMed ID: 37175878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of synthetic biology tools to engineer
Gao J; Jiang L; Lian J
Synth Syst Biotechnol; 2021 Jun; 6(2):110-119. PubMed ID: 33997361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genomic multiloci integration in Pichia pastoris.
Liu Q; Shi X; Song L; Liu H; Zhou X; Wang Q; Zhang Y; Cai M
Microb Cell Fact; 2019 Aug; 18(1):144. PubMed ID: 31434578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heterologous Single-Strand DNA-Annealing and Binding Protein Enhance CRISPR-Based Genome Editing Efficiency in
Deng M; Wu Y; Lv X; Liu L; Li J; Du G; Chen J; Liu Y
ACS Synth Biol; 2023 Nov; 12(11):3443-3453. PubMed ID: 37881961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing of the Komagataella phaffii to Obtain a Phytase-Producer Markerless Strain.
Tkachenko AA; Borshchevskaya LN; Sineoky SP; Gordeeva TL
Biochemistry (Mosc); 2023 Sep; 88(9):1338-1346. PubMed ID: 37770400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expanding the CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for Pichia pastoris with efficient donor integration and alternative resistance markers.
Weninger A; Fischer JE; Raschmanová H; Kniely C; Vogl T; Glieder A
J Cell Biochem; 2018 Apr; 119(4):3183-3198. PubMed ID: 29091307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The CRISPR-Cas12a Platform for Accurate Genome Editing, Gene Disruption, and Efficient Transgene Integration in Human Immune Cells.
Mohr M; Damas N; Gudmand-Høyer J; Zeeberg K; Jedrzejczyk D; Vlassis A; Morera-Gómez M; Pereira-Schoning S; Puš U; Oliver-Almirall A; Lyholm Jensen T; Baumgartner R; Tate Weinert B; Gill RT; Warnecke T
ACS Synth Biol; 2023 Feb; 12(2):375-389. PubMed ID: 36750230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing toolbox for Corynebacterium glutamicum.
Liu J; Wang Y; Lu Y; Zheng P; Sun J; Ma Y
Microb Cell Fact; 2017 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 29145843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of mouse and human preimplantation development following POU5F1 CRISPR/Cas9 targeting reveals interspecies differences.
Stamatiadis P; Boel A; Cosemans G; Popovic M; Bekaert B; Guggilla R; Tang M; De Sutter P; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Menten B; Stoop D; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Coucke P; Heindryckx B
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1242-1252. PubMed ID: 33609360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated virus resistance in agriculturally important crops.
Khatodia S; Bhatotia K; Tuteja N
Bioengineered; 2017 May; 8(3):274-279. PubMed ID: 28581909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. TEAD4 regulates trophectoderm differentiation upstream of CDX2 in a GATA3-independent manner in the human preimplantation embryo.
Stamatiadis P; Cosemans G; Boel A; Menten B; De Sutter P; Stoop D; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Lluis F; Coucke P; Heindryckx B
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1760-1773. PubMed ID: 35700449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing and Transcriptional Control in Yarrowia lipolytica.
Schwartz C; Wheeldon I
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1772():327-345. PubMed ID: 29754237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
