These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38535284)
41. Cost estimation of landfill leachate treatment by reverse osmosis in a Brazilian landfill. de Almeida R; Bila DM; Quintaes BR; Campos JC Waste Manag Res; 2020 Oct; 38(10):1087-1092. PubMed ID: 32546075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Investigation on operational parameters and membrane fouling performance in treating synthetic aquaculture wastewater via forward osmosis with sucrose as draw solution. Cheng X; Xu Y; Lei Z; Du J Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 847():157573. PubMed ID: 35882325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Mapping the economy of coal power plants retrofitted with post-combustion and biomass co-firing carbon capture in China. Yuan J; Wang Y; Zhang W; Zhang J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):47438-47454. PubMed ID: 36738409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A novel single-stage ceramic membrane moving bed biofilm reactor coupled with reverse osmosis for reclamation of municipal wastewater to NEWater-like product water. Sun H; Liu H; Zhang M; Liu Y Chemosphere; 2021 Apr; 268():128836. PubMed ID: 33168286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Spatial and temporal evolution of organic foulant layers on reverse osmosis membranes in wastewater reuse applications. Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM Water Res; 2014 Jul; 58():102-10. PubMed ID: 24747141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membranes at different positions of a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation. Tang F; Hu HY; Sun LJ; Sun YX; Shi N; Crittenden JC Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():329-336. PubMed ID: 26760485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Assessing the environmental externalities for biomass- and coal-fired electricity generation in China: A supply chain perspective. Wang C; Zhang L; Zhou P; Chang Y; Zhou D; Pang M; Yin H J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():758-767. PubMed ID: 31228689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of chemical agent injections on genotoxicity of wastewater in a microfiltration-reverse osmosis membrane process for wastewater reuse. Tang F; Hu HY; Wu QY; Tang X; Sun YX; Shi XL; Huang JJ J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():231-7. PubMed ID: 23770616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Membrane distillation crystallization technology for zero liquid discharge and resource recovery: Opportunities, challenges and futuristic perspectives. Yadav A; Labhasetwar PK; Shahi VK Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150692. PubMed ID: 34600997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Treating reverse osmosis concentrate to address scaling and fouling problems in zero-liquid discharge systems: A scientometric review of global trends. Yaqub M; Nguyen MN; Lee W Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 844():157081. PubMed ID: 35780878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Low cost reclamation using the Advanced Integrated Wastewater Pond Systems Technology and reverse osmosis. Downing JB; Bracco E; Green FB; Ku AY; Lundquist TJ; Zubieta IX; Oswald WJ Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 11833725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Impacts of seasonality and operating conditions on algal-dual osmosis membrane system for potable water reuse: Part 2. Bandara GLCL; Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige ISA; Xu X; Lin L; Jiang W; Zhang Y; Johnson DC; Nirmalakhandan N; Xu P J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 304():114295. PubMed ID: 35021589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of ultraviolet disinfection on the fouling of reverse osmosis membranes for municipal wastewater reclamation. Wu YH; Chen Z; Li X; Wang YH; Liu B; Chen GQ; Luo LW; Wang HB; Tong X; Bai Y; Xu YQ; Ikuno N; Li CF; Zhang HY; Hu HY Water Res; 2021 May; 195():116995. PubMed ID: 33721675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results. Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of fouling and RO performance for MBR treated fruit wastewater. Jamal-Uddin AT; Zytner RG Water Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 82(11):2282-2295. PubMed ID: 33339784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Study on bubble column humidification and dehumidification system for coal mine wastewater treatment. Gao P; Zhang M; Du Y; Cheng B; Zhang D Water Sci Technol; 2018 Apr; 77(7-8):1909-1919. PubMed ID: 29676748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment. Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Economic evaluation of the reuse of brewery wastewater. Verhuelsdonk M; Glas K; Parlar H J Environ Manage; 2021 Mar; 281():111804. PubMed ID: 33385910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Economic Evaluation of a Hybrid Desalination System Combining Forward and Reverse Osmosis. Choi Y; Cho H; Shin Y; Jang Y; Lee S Membranes (Basel); 2015 Dec; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 26729176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Characterization and biotoxicity assessment of dissolved organic matter in RO concentrate from a municipal wastewater reclamation reverse osmosis system. Sun YX; Gao Y; Hu HY; Tang F; Yang Z Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():545-51. PubMed ID: 25277967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]