These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38535978)

  • 1. Comment on: Incidence and factors for pseudoaccommodation after monofocal lens implantation: the Monofocal Extended Range of Vision study.
    Agrawal T; Radhakrishnan OK; Agrawal J; Agrawal S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2024 Jun; 50(6):660. PubMed ID: 38535978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply : Incidence and factors for pseudoaccommodation after monofocal lens implantation: the Monofocal Extended Range of Vision study.
    Nanavaty MA; Mukhija R; Ashena Z; Bunce C; Spalton DJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2024 Jun; 50(6):660. PubMed ID: 38598414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual function after monocular implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal or single-piece monofocal intraocular lens Randomized prospective comparison.
    Zhao G; Zhang J; Zhou Y; Hu L; Che C; Jiang N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):282-5. PubMed ID: 20152611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Beiko GHH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jan; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23098630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of astigmatism on multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Hayashi K; Hayashi H; Nakao F; Hayashi F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Oct; 130(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 11024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.
    Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):969-70. PubMed ID: 23688902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reply: comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.
    Beiko G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):970. PubMed ID: 23688903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
    Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accommodative intraocular lens versus standard monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery.
    Ong HS; Evans JR; Allan BD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 May; 2014(5):CD009667. PubMed ID: 24788900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of near vision, intraocular lens movement, and depth of focus with accommodating and monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Dhital A; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1872-8. PubMed ID: 24427795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens.
    Alió JL; Piñero DP; Plaza-Puche AB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1656-64. PubMed ID: 20870110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of patients with good uncorrected distance and near vision after monofocal intraocular lens implantation.
    Nanavaty MA; Vasavada AR; Patel AS; Raj SM; Desai TH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1091-7. PubMed ID: 16857493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective accommodation measurement of the Crystalens HD compared to monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Zamora-Alejo KV; Moore SP; Parker DG; Ullrich K; Esterman A; Goggin M
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 29(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 23380415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aging changes in apparent accommodation in eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Hayashi K; Hayashi H; Nakao F; Hayashi F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 135(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 12654357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Multifocal intraocular lenses].
    Zelichowska B; Rekas M; Stankiewicz A
    Klin Oczna; 2006; 108(4-6):247-52. PubMed ID: 17020006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of quality of life of patients after phacoemulsification with accommodating lens implantation].
    Ługowska M; Starus M; Synder A; Omulecki W; Wilczyński M
    Klin Oczna; 2014; 116(4):248-56. PubMed ID: 25906635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Marchini G; Mora P; Pedrotti E; Manzotti F; Aldigeri R; Gandolfi SA
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):2038-43. PubMed ID: 17555820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: Monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision.
    Pedrotti E; Carones F; Aiello F; Mastropasqua R; Bruni E; Bonacci E; Talli P; Nucci C; Mariotti C; Marchini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Feb; 44(2):156-167. PubMed ID: 29587972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
    Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of Accommodative Performance of a New Accommodative Intraocular Lens.
    Alió JL; Simonov AN; Romero D; Angelov A; Angelov Y; van Lawick W; Rombach MC
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Feb; 34(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 29425385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.