These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38536306)

  • 1. Examining personality for the selection and classification of soldiers: Validity and differential validity across jobs.
    Nye CD; White LA; Drasgow F; Prasad J; Chernyshenko OS; Stark S
    Mil Psychol; 2020; 32(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 38536306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: Does personality matter?
    Nye CD; White LA; Horgen K; Drasgow F; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
    Mil Psychol; 2020; 32(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 38536238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of a brief biodata scale as a predictor of job performance and its incremental validity over the Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits.
    Ramos-Villagrasa PJ; Fernández-Del-Río E; Castro Á
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274878. PubMed ID: 36178891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of personality on cadet academic and military performance within mediating role of self-efficacy.
    Bekesiene S
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1266236. PubMed ID: 37908826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incremental Validity of Personality Measures in Predicting Underwater Performance and Adaptation.
    Colodro J; Garcés-de-Los-Fayos EJ; López-García JJ; Colodro-Conde L
    Span J Psychol; 2015 Mar; 18():E15. PubMed ID: 26055931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The "g" in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection.
    Geiger M; Olderbak S; Sauter R; Wilhelm O
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2153. PubMed ID: 30483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100.
    Patterson F; Zibarras L; Ashworth V
    Med Teach; 2016; 38(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 26313700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of performance by non-cognitive traits.
    Drasgow F
    Mil Psychol; 2020; 32(1):127-134. PubMed ID: 38536299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incremental Validity of Character Strengths as Predictors of Job Performance Beyond General Mental Ability and the Big Five.
    Harzer C; Bezuglova N; Weber M
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():518369. PubMed ID: 33776825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS) as an indicator for counterproductive work behavior: Comparing validity in applicant, honest, and directed faking conditions.
    Trent JD; Barron LG; Rose MR; Carretta TR
    Mil Psychol; 2020; 32(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 38536272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.
    Cao M; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Nov; 104(11):1347-1368. PubMed ID: 31070382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personality Traits and Occupational Demands Are Linked to Dietary Supplement Use in Soldiers: A Cross-sectional Study of Sensation Seeking Behaviors.
    Hatch AM; Cole RE; DiChiara AJ; McGraw SM; Merrill EP; Wright AO; Lieberman HR; Bukhari AS
    Mil Med; 2019 Mar; 184(3-4):e253-e262. PubMed ID: 30137399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acquaintance ratings of the Big Five personality traits: incremental validity beyond and interactive effects with self-reports in the prediction of workplace deviance.
    Kluemper DH; McLarty BD; Bing MN
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Jan; 100(1):237-48. PubMed ID: 25198097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context.
    Sørlie HO; Hetland J; Dysvik A; Fosse TH; Martinsen ØL
    Mil Psychol; 2020; 32(3):237-246. PubMed ID: 38536376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing forced-choice and single-stimulus personality scores on a level playing field: A meta-analysis of psychometric properties and susceptibility to faking.
    Speer AB; Wegmeyer LJ; Tenbrink AP; Delacruz AY; Christiansen ND; Salim RM
    J Appl Psychol; 2023 Nov; 108(11):1812-1833. PubMed ID: 37326537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
    Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can Forced-Choice Response Format Reduce Faking of Socially Aversive Personality Traits?
    Valone ALY; Meade AW
    J Pers Assess; 2024 Mar; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38501713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. Army physical demands study: Prevalence and frequency of performing physically demanding tasks in deployed and non-deployed settings.
    Boye MW; Cohen BS; Sharp MA; Canino MC; Foulis SA; Larcom K; Smith L
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S57-S61. PubMed ID: 28928023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classifying U.S. Army Military Occupational Specialties using the Occupational Information Network.
    Gadermann AM; Heeringa SG; Stein MB; Ursano RJ; Colpe LJ; Fullerton CS; Gilman SE; Gruber MJ; Nock MK; Rosellini AJ; Sampson NA; Schoenbaum M; Zaslavsky AM; Kessler RC;
    Mil Med; 2014 Jul; 179(7):752-61. PubMed ID: 25003860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.