These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Influence of Nanocoats on the Physicomechanical Properties and Microleakage of Bulk-fill and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements: An Habib SI; Yassen AA; Bayoumi RE J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 34002711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative. Alrahlah A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jan; 19(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29358529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monomer conversion, dimensional stability, biaxial flexural strength, and fluoride release of resin-based restorative material containing alkaline fillers. Panpisut P; Toneluck A Dent Mater J; 2020 Aug; 39(4):608-615. PubMed ID: 32037385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems. Francois P; Vennat E; Le Goff S; Ruscassier N; Attal JP; Dursun E Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2599-2608. PubMed ID: 30317399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface hardness and flexural strength of dual-cured bulk-fill restorative materials after solvent storage. Alzahrani B; Alshabib A; Awliya W BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):306. PubMed ID: 37208664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material. Moshaverinia M; Navas A; Jahedmanesh N; Shah KC; Moshaverinia A; Ansari S J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 31326149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of thermal aging on microhardness and SEM/EDS for characterisation bioactive filling materials. Birant S; Gümüştaş B BMC Oral Health; 2024 Sep; 24(1):1142. PubMed ID: 39334004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and surface microhardness of EQUIA Forte, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with conventional glass-ionomer cement. Poornima P; Koley P; Kenchappa M; Nagaveni NB; Bharath KP; Neena IE J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(3):265-270. PubMed ID: 31584026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ion releasing direct restorative materials: Key mechanical properties and wear. Daabash R; Alshabib A; Alqahtani MQ; Price RB; Silikas N; Alshaafi MM Dent Mater; 2022 Dec; 38(12):1866-1877. PubMed ID: 36202659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Attin T; Vataschki M; Hellwig E Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 9063235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microshear Bond Strength of Tri-Calcium Silicate-based Cements to Different Restorative Materials. Cengiz E; Ulusoy N J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 27045140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flexural Properties of Bioactive Restoratives in Cariogenic Environments. Yap AU; Choo HS; Choo HY; Yahya NA Oper Dent; 2021 Jul; 46(4):448-456. PubMed ID: 34425586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In Vitro Comparison of Surface Roughness, Flexural, and Microtensile Strength of Various Glass-Ionomer-Based Materials and a New Alkasite Restorative Material. Kaptan A; Oznurhan F; Candan M Polymers (Basel); 2023 Jan; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 36771950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is Cention-N comparable to other direct dental restorative materials? A systematic review with network meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Justen M; Scheck D; Münchow EA; Jardim JJ Dent Mater; 2024 Sep; 40(9):1341-1352. PubMed ID: 38880724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexural strength and microhardness of bulk-fill restorative materials. de Mendonça BC; Soto-Montero JR; de Castro EF; Pecorari VGA; Rueggeberg FA; Giannini M J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Jun; 33(4):628-635. PubMed ID: 33675162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars. Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro characterization of a novel resin-based restorative material containing alkaline fillers. Mederos M; León E; García A; Cuevas-Suárez CE; Hernández-Cabanillas JC; Rivera-Gonzaga JA; Grazioli G J Appl Oral Sci; 2024; 32():e20230219. PubMed ID: 38232277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An alkasite restorative material effectively remineralized artificial interproximal enamel caries in vitro. Theerarath T; Sriarj W Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4437-4445. PubMed ID: 35190884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate on bond strength of a glass-fibre post luted with resin or glass-ionomer based cement. de Araújo DF; Chaves LP; Bim O; Pimentel Garcia FC; Ishikiriama SK; Honório HM; Wang L J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 24613604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]