These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38537272)

  • 1. The Effects of Load, Crank Position, and Sex on the Biomechanics and Performance during an Upper Body Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Antolinez AK; Edwards PF; Holmes MWR; Beaudette SM; Button DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2024 Aug; 56(8):1422-1436. PubMed ID: 38537272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neuromechanical Differences between Pronated and Supinated Forearm Positions during Upper-Body Wingate Tests.
    Alizadeh S; Edwards PF; Lockyer EJ; Holmes MWR; Power KE; Behm DG; Button DC
    J Sports Sci Med; 2024 Jun; 23(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 38841629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of the optimal load setting for arm crank anaerobic testing in men and women.
    Forbes SC; Kennedy MD; Boule NB; Bell G
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 35(10):835-9. PubMed ID: 24920563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of arm Wingate Anaerobic Testing in persons with complete paraplegia.
    Jacobs PL; Mahoney ET; Johnson B
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2003; 26(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 12828291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Horizontal Crank Position Affects Economy and Upper Limb Kinematics of Recumbent Handcyclists.
    Stone B; Mason BS; Warner MB; Goosey-Tolfrey VL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2019 Nov; 51(11):2265-2273. PubMed ID: 31634293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of crank position and backrest inclination on shoulder load and mechanical efficiency during handcycling.
    Arnet U; van Drongelen S; Schlüssel M; Lay V; van der Woude LH; Veeger HE
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2014 Apr; 24(2):386-94. PubMed ID: 22989023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of upper extremity anaerobic power assessment in persons with tetraplegia.
    Jacobs PL; Johnson B; Somarriba GA; Carter AB
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2005; 28(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 15889698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does upper body strength and power influence upper body Wingate performance in men and women?
    Lovell D; Mason D; Delphinus E; Eagles A; Shewring S; McLellan C
    Int J Sports Med; 2011 Oct; 32(10):771-5. PubMed ID: 21618156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of acute pre-workout supplementation on power and strength performance.
    Martinez N; Campbell B; Franek M; Buchanan L; Colquhoun R
    J Int Soc Sports Nutr; 2016; 13():29. PubMed ID: 27429596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Submaximal arm crank ergometry: Effects of crank axis positioning on mechanical efficiency, physiological strain and perceived discomfort.
    van Drongelen S; Maas JC; Scheel-Sailer A; Van Der Woude LH
    J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 19205993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of acute caffeine ingestion on upper and lower body anaerobic exercise performance.
    Duncan MJ; Eyre E; Grgic J; Tallis J
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2019 Nov; 19(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 31013204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of energy systems during the upper body Wingate anaerobic test.
    Lovell D; Kerr A; Wiegand A; Solomon C; Harvey L; McLellan C
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2013 Feb; 38(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 23438235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recovery of upper-body muscle power after short intensive exercise: comparing boys and men.
    Weinstein Y; Inbar O; Mor-Unikovski R; Luder A; Dubnov-Raz G
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 Aug; 118(8):1555-1564. PubMed ID: 29761312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of mechanical compression due to load carrying on shoulder muscle fatigue during sustained isometric arm abduction: an electromyographic study.
    Piscione J; Gamet D
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Jul; 97(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 16767438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strength and power adaptations of the upper body following 20 training sessions on an eccentric arm-crank ergometer.
    Perret C; Käch M; Hertig-Godeschalk A; Ammann F
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2024 Sep; 124(9):2777-2785. PubMed ID: 38656379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical and Physiological Determinants of Rock Climbing.
    MacKenzie R; Monaghan L; Masson RA; Werner AK; Caprez TS; Johnston L; Kemi OJ
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2020 Feb; 15(2):168-179. PubMed ID: 31094249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Test-Retest Reliability of Force Plate-Derived Parameters of the Countermovement Push-Up as a Power Assessment Tool.
    Parry GN; Herrington LC; Horsley IG
    J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Mar; 29(3):381-383. PubMed ID: 31628273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elbow joint fatigue and bench-press training.
    Huang YP; Chou YL; Chen FC; Wang RT; Huang MJ; Chou PP
    J Athl Train; 2014; 49(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 24533529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wingate anaerobic test reference values for male power athletes.
    Coppin E; Heath EM; Bressel E; Wagner DR
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2012 Sep; 7(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 22174179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences of intermittent elbow flexion power using various loads.
    Yamaji S; Demura S; Yamamoto K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):629-42. PubMed ID: 19093623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.