BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38537570)

  • 21. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study.
    Kim G; Phillips J; Cole E; Brook A; Mehta T; Slanetz P; Fishman MDC; Karimova E; Mehta R; Lotfi P; Resteghini N; Raj S; Dialani V
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1456-1463. PubMed ID: 31092346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
    Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography for suspicious findings in dense breasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lin ST; Li HJ; Li YZ; Chen QQ; Ye JY; Lin S; Cai SQ; Sun JG
    Cancer Med; 2024 Apr; 13(8):e7128. PubMed ID: 38659408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hussein H; Abbas E; Keshavarzi S; Fazelzad R; Bukhanov K; Kulkarni S; Au F; Ghai S; Alabousi A; Freitas V
    Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e221785. PubMed ID: 36719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer.
    Berg WA; Bandos AI; Sava MG
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Aug; 20(8):758-768. PubMed ID: 37394083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
    Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; Geller B; Dittus K; Braithwaite D; Wernli KJ; Miglioretti DL; O'Meara ES;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 May; 173(9):807-16. PubMed ID: 23552817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
    Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Racial/ethnic differences in supplemental imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts.
    Ezratty C; Vang S; Brown J; Margolies LR; Jandorf L; Lin JJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 182(1):181-185. PubMed ID: 32394349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancer risk characteristics of women undergoing whole-breast ultrasound screening versus mammography alone.
    Sprague BL; Ichikawa L; Eavey J; Lowry KP; Rauscher G; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Chen S; Lee JM; Stout NK; Mandelblatt JS; Alsheik N; Herschorn SD; Perry H; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer; 2023 Aug; 129(16):2456-2468. PubMed ID: 37303202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density.
    Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Su YR; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Wernli K; Miglioretti DL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2024 Feb; 116(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 37897090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Supplemental screening in the dense breast: does molecular breast imaging have a role?
    Rhodes DJ
    Menopause; 2020 Jan; 27(1):110-112. PubMed ID: 31880677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.
    Sorin V; Yagil Y; Yosepovich A; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Neiman OH; Sklair-Levy M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W267-W274. PubMed ID: 30240292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Breast density implications and supplemental screening.
    Vourtsis A; Berg WA
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1762-1777. PubMed ID: 30255244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
    Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does three-dimensional functional infrared imaging improve breast cancer detection based on digital mammography in women with dense breasts?
    Hellgren RJ; Sundbom AE; Czene K; Izhaky D; Hall P; Dickman PW
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6227-6235. PubMed ID: 31115623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
    Mann RM; Athanasiou A; Baltzer PAT; Camps-Herrero J; Clauser P; Fallenberg EM; Forrai G; Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Killburn-Toppin F; Lesaru M; Panizza P; Pediconi F; Pijnappel RM; Pinker K; Sardanelli F; Sella T; Thomassin-Naggara I; Zackrisson S; Gilbert FJ; Kuhl CK;
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):4036-4045. PubMed ID: 35258677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.