135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38538814)
1. A novel breast cancer image classification model based on multiscale texture feature analysis and dynamic learning.
Guo J; Yuan H; Shi B; Zheng X; Zhang Z; Li H; Sato Y
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):7216. PubMed ID: 38538814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Few-shot learning with deformable convolution for multiscale lesion detection in mammography.
Li C; Zhang D; Tian Z; Du S; Qu Y
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2970-2985. PubMed ID: 32160321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Adaptive Learning Model for Multiscale Texture Features in Polyp Classification via Computed Tomographic Colonography.
Cao W; Pomeroy MJ; Zhang S; Tan J; Liang Z; Gao Y; Abbasi AF; Pickhardt PJ
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
Jebamony J; Jacob D
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical image classification via multiscale representation learning.
Tang Q; Liu Y; Liu H
Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jun; 79():71-78. PubMed ID: 28701276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.
Sakai A; Onishi Y; Matsui M; Adachi H; Teramoto A; Saito K; Fujita H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 31686300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-scale attention-based convolutional neural network for classification of breast masses in mammograms.
Niu J; Li H; Zhang C; Li D
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):3878-3892. PubMed ID: 33982807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using multiscale texture and density features for near-term breast cancer risk analysis.
Sun W; Tseng TL; Qian W; Zhang J; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Lure F; Yu H; Zhou S
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2853-62. PubMed ID: 26127038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced breast mass mammography classification approach based on pre-processing and hybridization of transfer learning models.
Boudouh SS; Bouakkaz M
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Nov; 149(16):14549-14564. PubMed ID: 37567987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast mass detection and diagnosis using fused features with density.
Wang Z; Huang Y; Li M; Zhang H; Li C; Xin J; Qian W
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(2):321-342. PubMed ID: 30856154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Augmenting Transfer Learning with Feature Extraction Techniques for Limited Breast Imaging Datasets.
R V A; R A; A P S
J Digit Imaging; 2021 Jun; 34(3):618-629. PubMed ID: 33973065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A twin convolutional neural network with hybrid binary optimizer for multimodal breast cancer digital image classification.
Oyelade ON; Irunokhai EA; Wang H
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):692. PubMed ID: 38184742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-stage fusion framework to classify breast lesions using deep learning and radiomics features computed from four-view mammograms.
Jones MA; Sadeghipour N; Chen X; Islam W; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7670-7683. PubMed ID: 37083190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for breast cancer screening.
Chougrad H; Zouaki H; Alheyane O
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():19-30. PubMed ID: 29477427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]