135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38538814)
21. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Integrated local binary pattern texture features for classification of breast tissue imaged by optical coherence microscopy.
Wan S; Lee HC; Huang X; Xu T; Xu T; Zeng X; Zhang Z; Sheikine Y; Connolly JL; Fujimoto JG; Zhou C
Med Image Anal; 2017 May; 38():104-116. PubMed ID: 28327449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical Image Classification Based on Deep Features Extracted by Deep Model and Statistic Feature Fusion with Multilayer Perceptron
Lai Z; Deng H
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2018; 2018():2061516. PubMed ID: 30298088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of pixel resolution on texture features of breast masses in mammograms.
Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM; Ayres FJ; Nandi AK
J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 19756865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Classification of Mammogram Images Using Multiscale all Convolutional Neural Network (MA-CNN).
Agnes SA; Anitha J; Pandian SIA; Peter JD
J Med Syst; 2019 Dec; 44(1):30. PubMed ID: 31838610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast microcalcifications detection based on fusing features with DTCWT.
Wang Z; Xin J; Zhang Q; Gao S; Ma C; Ren J; Zhang H; Qian W; Zhu W; Zhang X; Liu J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(2):197-218. PubMed ID: 31985483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Usefulness of texture analysis for computerized classification of breast lesions on mammograms.
Pereira RR; Azevedo Marques PM; Honda MO; Kinoshita SK; Engelmann R; Muramatsu C; Doi K
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 17122993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms.
Danala G; Patel B; Aghaei F; Heidari M; Li J; Wu T; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1419-1431. PubMed ID: 29748869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Deep feature classification of angiomyolipoma without visible fat and renal cell carcinoma in abdominal contrast-enhanced CT images with texture image patches and hand-crafted feature concatenation.
Lee H; Hong H; Kim J; Jung DC
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 29474742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The impact of (simulated) resolution on breast cancer diagnosis based on high-resolution 3D micro-CT microcalcification images.
Brahimetaj R; Cornelis J; Van Ongeval C; De Mey J; Jansen B
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):1754-1762. PubMed ID: 37698346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast ultrasound tumor image classification using image decomposition and fusion based on adaptive multi-model spatial feature fusion.
Zhuang Z; Yang Z; Raj ANJ; Wei C; Jin P; Zhuang S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106221. PubMed ID: 34144251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deep Neural Networks With Region-Based Pooling Structures for Mammographic Image Classification.
Shu X; Zhang L; Wang Z; Lv Q; Yi Z
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 39(6):2246-2255. PubMed ID: 31985411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.
Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks.
Arevalo J; González FA; Ramos-Pollán R; Oliveira JL; Guevara Lopez MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 127():248-57. PubMed ID: 26826901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Hybrid Deep Transfer Learning of CNN-Based LR-PCA for Breast Lesion Diagnosis via Medical Breast Mammograms.
Samee NA; Alhussan AA; Ghoneim VF; Atteia G; Alkanhel R; Al-Antari MA; Kadah YM
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM.
Robinson K; Li H; Lan L; Schacht D; Giger M
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2145-2156. PubMed ID: 30802972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification.
Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A fully integrated computer-aided diagnosis system for digital X-ray mammograms via deep learning detection, segmentation, and classification.
Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Choi MT; Han SM; Kim TS
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Sep; 117():44-54. PubMed ID: 30032964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Deep Learning: a Promising Method for Histological Class Prediction of Breast Tumors in Mammography.
Nica RE; Șerbănescu MS; Florescu LM; Camen GC; Streba CT; Gheonea IA
J Digit Imaging; 2021 Oct; 34(5):1190-1198. PubMed ID: 34505960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast cancer detection and classification in digital mammography based on Non-Subsampled Contourlet Transform (NSCT) and Super Resolution.
Pak F; Kanan HR; Alikhassi A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Nov; 122(2):89-107. PubMed ID: 26206406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
