These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38538947)

  • 21. Reward and attentional control in visual search.
    Yantis S; Anderson BA; Wampler EK; Laurent PA
    Nebr Symp Motiv; 2012; 59():91-116. PubMed ID: 23437631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Pearson D; Griffiths O; Beesley T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):158-171. PubMed ID: 25420117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
    Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attention capture is temporally stable: Evidence from mixed-model correlations.
    Weichselbaum H; Huber-Huber C; Ansorge U
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():206-224. PubMed ID: 30081374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attention to Stimuli of Learned versus Innate Biological Value Relies on Separate Neural Systems.
    Kaskan PM; Nicholas MA; Dean AM; Murray EA
    J Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 42(49):9242-9252. PubMed ID: 36319119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reward history but not search history explains value-driven attentional capture.
    Marchner JR; Preuschhof C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1436-1448. PubMed ID: 29675555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relative saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of color and face singleton distractors: evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Zhang Y; Zhang H; Fu S
    Cereb Cortex; 2024 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 38679483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors.
    Ansorge U; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):83-104. PubMed ID: 22016048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Value-modulated attentional capture is augmented by win-related sensory cues.
    Pearson D; Piao M; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):133-143. PubMed ID: 36803153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 31152432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Uncertainty-modulated attentional capture: Outcome variance increases attentional priority.
    Pearson D; Chong A; Chow JYL; Garner KG; Theeuwes J; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1628-1643. PubMed ID: 38695800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitivity to value-driven attention is predicted by how we learn from value.
    Jahfari S; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):408-415. PubMed ID: 27357956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.