BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38541054)

  • 1. Digital Validation in Breast Cancer Needle Biopsies: Comparison of Histological Grade and Biomarker Expression Assessment Using Conventional Light Microscopy, Whole Slide Imaging, and Digital Image Analysis.
    Choi JE; Kim KH; Lee Y; Kang DW
    J Pers Med; 2024 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 38541054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of Whole Slide Imaging for primary surgical pathology diagnosis of prostate biopsies.
    Rao V; Subramanian P; Sali AP; Menon S; Desai SB
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2021; 64(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 33433413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast Cancer Prognostic Factors in the Digital Era: Comparison of Nottingham Grade using Whole Slide Images and Glass Slides.
    Davidson TM; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Onega T; Allison KH; Mercan E; Brunyé TT; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
    J Pathol Inform; 2019; 10():11. PubMed ID: 31057980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of whole-slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of liver biopsies in a University Hospital.
    Saco A; Diaz A; Hernandez M; Martinez D; Montironi C; Castillo P; Rakislova N; Del Pino M; Martinez A; Ordi J
    Dig Liver Dis; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 28780052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies.
    Reyes C; Ikpatt OF; Nadji M; Cote RJ
    J Pathol Inform; 2014; 5(1):5. PubMed ID: 24741464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic validation of a portable whole slide imaging scanner for lymphoma diagnosis in resource-constrained setting: A cross-sectional study.
    Mremi A; Achola C; Mbwambo D; Magorosa E; Legason ID; Vavoulis D; El Mouden C; Schuh A; Mnango L;
    J Pathol Inform; 2023; 14():100188. PubMed ID: 36714453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer histologic grading using digital microscopy: concordance and outcome association.
    Rakha EA; Aleskandarani M; Toss MS; Green AR; Ball G; Ellis IO; Dalton LW
    J Clin Pathol; 2018 Aug; 71(8):680-686. PubMed ID: 29535212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
    Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer.
    Stålhammar G; Fuentes Martinez N; Lippert M; Tobin NP; Mølholm I; Kis L; Rosin G; Rantalainen M; Pedersen L; Bergh J; Grunkin M; Hartman J
    Mod Pathol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 26916072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The performance of digital microscopy for primary diagnosis in human pathology: a systematic review.
    Araújo ALD; Arboleda LPA; Palmier NR; Fonsêca JM; de Pauli Paglioni M; Gomes-Silva W; Ribeiro ACP; Brandão TB; Simonato LE; Speight PM; Fonseca FP; Lopes MA; de Almeida OP; Vargas PA; Madrid Troconis CC; Santos-Silva AR
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Mar; 474(3):269-287. PubMed ID: 30685784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
    Mantrala S; Ginter PS; Mitkari A; Joshi S; Prabhala H; Ramachandra V; Kini L; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar AB; Wilson P; Singh K; Harigopal M; Koka D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 146(11):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 35271701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whole slide imaging diagnostic concordance with light microscopy for breast needle biopsies.
    Campbell WS; Hinrichs SH; Lele SM; Baker JJ; Lazenby AJ; Talmon GA; Smith LM; West WW
    Hum Pathol; 2014 Aug; 45(8):1713-21. PubMed ID: 24913758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between digital image analysis and visual assessment of immunohistochemical HER2 expression in breast cancer.
    Jakobsen MR; Teerapakpinyo C; Shuangshoti S; Keelawat S
    Pathol Res Pract; 2018 Dec; 214(12):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 30377025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conventional Microscopical versus Digital Whole-Slide Imaging-Based Diagnosis of Thin-Layer Cervical Specimens: A Validation Study.
    Bongaerts O; Clevers C; Debets M; Paffen D; Senden L; Rijks K; Ruiten L; Sie-Go D; van Diest PJ; Nap M
    J Pathol Inform; 2018; 9():29. PubMed ID: 30197818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of whole slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of gynaecological pathology in a University Hospital.
    Ordi J; Castillo P; Saco A; Del Pino M; Ordi O; Rodríguez-Carunchio L; Ramírez J
    J Clin Pathol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 25355520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concordance, intra- and inter-observer agreements between light microscopy and whole slide imaging for samples acquired by EUS in pancreatic solid lesions.
    Larghi A; Fornelli A; Lega S; Ragazzi M; Carlinfante G; Baccarini P; Fabbri C; Pierotti P; Tallini G; Bondi A; de Biase D
    Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Nov; 51(11):1574-1579. PubMed ID: 31147212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.
    Zhong F; Bi R; Yu B; Yang F; Yang W; Shui R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150505. PubMed ID: 26928407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in digital and routine microscopic assessment of prostate needle biopsies.
    Rodriguez-Urrego PA; Cronin AM; Al-Ahmadie HA; Gopalan A; Tickoo SK; Reuter VE; Fine SW
    Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 20970164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deep learning supported mitoses counting on whole slide images: A pilot study for validating breast cancer grading in the clinical workflow.
    van Bergeijk SA; Stathonikos N; Ter Hoeve ND; Lafarge MW; Nguyen TQ; van Diest PJ; Veta M
    J Pathol Inform; 2023; 14():100316. PubMed ID: 37273455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High agreement between whole slide imaging and optical microscopy for assessment of HER2 expression in breast cancer: whole slide imaging for the assessment of HER2 expression.
    Nunes C; Rocha R; Buzelin M; Balabram D; Foureaux F; Porto S; Gobbi H
    Pathol Res Pract; 2014 Nov; 210(11):713-8. PubMed ID: 25091257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.