These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38541778)

  • 1. Impact of the Timing of Mechanical Circulatory Support on the Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Subanalysis of the PREPARE CS Registry.
    Prunea DM; Bachl E; Herold L; Kanoun Schnur SS; Pätzold S; Altmanninger-Sock S; Sommer GA; Glantschnig T; Kolesnik E; Wallner M; Ablasser K; Bugger H; Buschmann E; Praschk A; Fruhwald FM; Schmidt A; von Lewinski D; Toth GG
    J Clin Med; 2024 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 38541778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization.
    Tarantini G; Masiero G; Burzotta F; Pazzanese V; Briguori C; Trani C; Piva T; De Marco F; Di Biasi M; Pagnotta P; Mojoli M; Casu G; Giustino G; Lorenzoni G; Montorfano M; Ancona MB; Pappalardo F; Chieffo A;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 98(2):E222-E234. PubMed ID: 33793051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
    Choi KH; Yang JH; Park TK; Lee JM; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Ahn CM; Yu CW; Park IH; Jang WJ; Kim HJ; Bae JW; Kwon SU; Lee HJ; Lee WS; Jeong JO; Park SD; Kang TS; Gwon HC
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 May; 12(10):e029792. PubMed ID: 37158104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
    Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic Impact of Active Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction, Results from the Culprit-Shock Trial.
    Feistritzer HJ; Desch S; Freund A; Poess J; Zeymer U; Ouarrak T; Schneider S; de Waha-Thiele S; Fuernau G; Eitel I; Noc M; Stepinska J; Huber K; Thiele H
    J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32599815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry.
    O'Neill WW; Schreiber T; Wohns DH; Rihal C; Naidu SS; Civitello AB; Dixon SR; Massaro JM; Maini B; Ohman EM
    J Interv Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24329756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.
    Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock-The PREPARE CardShock registry.
    von Lewinski D; Herold L; Stoffel C; Pätzold S; Fruhwald F; Altmanninger-Sock S; Kolesnik E; Wallner M; Rainer P; Bugger H; Verheyen N; Rohrer U; Manninger-Wünscher M; Scherr D; Renz D; Yates A; Zirlik A; Toth GG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 100(3):319-327. PubMed ID: 35830719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients.
    Bhuiyan R; Bimal T; Fishbein J; Gandotra P; Selim S; Ong L; Gruberg L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():68-73. PubMed ID: 37076412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients.
    Schäfer A; Werner N; Burkhoff D; Sieweke JT; Zietzer A; Masyuk M; Junker Udesen NL; Westenfeld R; Møller JE
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2020; 7():74. PubMed ID: 32478095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women With Cardiogenic Shock Derive Greater Benefit From Early Mechanical Circulatory Support: An Update From the cVAD Registry.
    Joseph SM; Brisco MA; Colvin M; Grady KL; Walsh MN; Cook JL;
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 29(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 27229327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.
    Chatzis G; Markus B; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Divchev D; Syntila S; Scheele N; Al Eryani H; Tousoulis D; Schieffer B; Karatolios K
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Jun; 49(6):943-955. PubMed ID: 33729726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock.
    Lemor A; Hosseini Dehkordi SH; Basir MB; Villablanca PA; Jain T; Koenig GC; Alaswad K; Moses JW; Kapur NK; O'Neill W
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1465-1471. PubMed ID: 32605901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.