These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38544239)

  • 1. Persona-PhysioSync AV: Personalized Interaction through Personality and Physiology Monitoring in Autonomous Vehicles.
    Giron J; Sela Y; Barenboim L; Gilboa-Freedman G; Amichai-Hamburger Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 38544239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shaping driver-vehicle interaction in autonomous vehicles: How the new in-vehicle systems match the human needs.
    Sun X; Cao S; Tang P
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103238. PubMed ID: 33010571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis.
    Lee S; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106932. PubMed ID: 36580765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal traffic conflict analysis of autonomous and traditional vehicle platoons in field tests via surrogate safety measures.
    Das T; Shoaib Samandar M; Rouphail N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106822. PubMed ID: 36103759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Knowledge as a key determinant of public support for autonomous vehicles.
    Tan H; Liu J; Chen C; Zhao X; Yang J; Tang C
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):2156. PubMed ID: 38272977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shifting Perceptions and Emotional Responses to Autonomous Vehicles Using Simulated Experiences.
    Tapia JL; Sánchez-Borda D; Iniesta C; Badea F; Duñabeitia JA
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38247681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.
    Chen P; Ni H; Wang L; Yu G; Sun J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May; 199():107530. PubMed ID: 38437756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying the Impact of Deployments of Autonomous Vehicles and Intelligent Roads on Road Safety in China: A Country-Level Modeling Study.
    Tan H; Zhao F; Song H; Liu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using voice recognition to measure trust during interactions with automated vehicles.
    Deng M; Chen J; Wu Y; Ma S; Li H; Yang Z; Shen Y
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Apr; 116():104184. PubMed ID: 38048717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trusting autonomous vehicles as moral agents improves related policy support.
    Hurst KF; Sintov ND
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():976023. PubMed ID: 36337556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What can we learn from autonomous vehicle collision data on crash severity? A cost-sensitive CART approach.
    Zhu S; Meng Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106769. PubMed ID: 35858521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Velocity control in car-following behavior with autonomous vehicles using reinforcement learning.
    Wang Z; Huang H; Tang J; Meng X; Hu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106729. PubMed ID: 35700685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of pre-crash scenarios and contributing factors for autonomous vehicle crashes at intersections.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Liu S; Yu C; Glaser Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107383. PubMed ID: 37984113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety risk assessment for autonomous vehicle road testing.
    Tu H; Wang M; Li H; Sun L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(7):652-661. PubMed ID: 37486240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):544-561. PubMed ID: 35469464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards common ethical and safe 'behaviour' standards for automated vehicles.
    Papadimitriou E; Farah H; van de Kaa G; Santoni de Sio F; Hagenzieker M; van Gelder P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106724. PubMed ID: 35691223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I; Mohammadnazar A; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age is more than just a number: The relationship among age, non-chronological age factors, self-perceived driving abilities, and autonomous vehicle acceptance.
    Huang G; Hung YH; Proctor RW; Pitts BJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Dec; 178():106850. PubMed ID: 36270109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.