116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38544336)
1. Prediction of jaw opening function after mandibular reconstruction using subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling.
Chen J; Wang J; Guo J; Wang X; Kang Y; Wang Y; Guo C
J Oral Rehabil; 2024 Jun; 51(6):1050-1060. PubMed ID: 38544336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Designing customized temporomandibular fossa prosthesis based on envelope surface of condyle movement: validation via
Wang JL; Wang J; Chen KN; Guo JQ; Xu XL; Guo CB
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1273263. PubMed ID: 38026896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. EMG-assisted forward dynamics simulation of subject-specific mandible musculoskeletal system.
Guo J; Chen J; Wang J; Ren G; Tian Q; Guo C
J Biomech; 2022 Jun; 139():111143. PubMed ID: 35623286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The fitting accuracy of pre-bend reconstruction plates and their impact on the temporomandibular joint.
Wurm MC; Hagen J; Nkenke E; Neukam FW; Schlittenbauer T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 30470467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prolonged mandibular hypomobility patient with a "square mandible" configuration with coronoid process and angle hyperplasia.
Murakami K; Yokoe Y; Yasuda S; Tsuboi Y; Iizuka T
Cranio; 2000 Apr; 18(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 11202821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Modified Method Using Double Computed Tomography Scan Procedure to Maintain Mandibular Width in Mandibular Reconstruction.
Shen S; Yang C; Wu J; Zhang L; Wang X; Shi J; Zhang S
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(2):e126-e130. PubMed ID: 31764568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of joint kinematics in patients with condylar reconstruction using mandibular motion simulation based on intraoral scanning registration.
Chen J; Wang J; Wang Y; Wang D; Xu X; Guo C
Int J Comput Dent; 2024 Mar; 27(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 36811289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human jaw joint hypermobility: Diagnosis and biomechanical modelling.
Tuijt M; Parsa A; Koutris M; Berkhout E; Koolstra JH; Lobbezoo F
J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 45(10):783-789. PubMed ID: 29972704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandibular movements at maximum mouth opening and EMG activity of masticatory and neck muscles in patients rehabilitated after a mandibular condyle fracture.
Sforza C; Tartaglia GM; Lovecchio N; Ugolini A; Monteverdi R; Giannì AB; Ferrario VF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 37(6):327-33. PubMed ID: 19539492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated jaw and neck function in man. Studies of mandibular and head-neck movements during jaw opening-closing tasks.
Zafar H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2000; (143):1-41. PubMed ID: 11234611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient Specific Three-Dimensional Implant for Reconstruction of Complex Mandibular Defect.
U V; Mehrotra D; Howlader D; Singh PK; Gupta S
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 30(4):e308-e311. PubMed ID: 31166275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of virtually 3D planned resection templates in mandibular reconstruction.
Weijs WL; Coppen C; Schreurs R; Vreeken RD; Verhulst AC; Merkx MA; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 44(11):1828-1832. PubMed ID: 27713052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional analysis of jaw kinematic alterations in patients with chronic TMD - disc displacement with reduction.
Mapelli A; Machado BC; Garcia DM; Rodrigues Da Silva MA; Sforza C; de Felício CM
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 43(11):824-832. PubMed ID: 27545052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rotational head motion concurrent to rhythmical mandibular opening movements.
Kohno S; Kohno T; Medina RU
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Aug; 28(8):740-7. PubMed ID: 11556955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery and Mandibular Reconstruction Using Selective-Laser Sintered Titanium Implant.
Hatamleh MM; Bhamrah G; Ryba F; Mack G; Huppa C
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):1810-1814. PubMed ID: 27548831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical application and accuracy analysis of occlusion-guided functional mandibular reconstruction].
Yu D; Huang J; Yu C; Chen J; Zhao W; Liu J; Zhu H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 34(11):1410-1416. PubMed ID: 33191699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3D Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability.
Sennerby L; Andersson P; Pagliani L; Giani C; Moretti G; Molinari M; Motroni A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):844-53. PubMed ID: 24373386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of accuracy and sensory outcomes of mandibular reconstruction using computer-assisted surgical simulation.
Zhou Z; Zhao H; Zhang S; Zheng J; Yang C
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 30471936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates and dental implants: A new modality for functional reconstruction of mandibular defects.
Schepers RH; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Stenekes MW; Kraeima J; Roodenburg JL; Reintsema H; Witjes MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 25911122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
