These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38544540)
1. Choice of Entry Point Does Not Affect Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Antegrade Intra-medullary Nailing in Patients with Shaft of Femur Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Gaurav A; Kumar P; Sudesh P; Prakash M; Meena SC; Patel S; Kumar V Indian J Orthop; 2024 Apr; 58(4):339-344. PubMed ID: 38544540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Greater trochanteric versus piriformis fossa entry nails for femur shaft fractures: Resolving the controversy. Kumar P; Neradi D; Kansal R; Aggarwal S; Kumar V; Dhillon MS Injury; 2019 Oct; 50(10):1715-1724. PubMed ID: 31358301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. Ricci WM; Schwappach J; Tucker M; Coupe K; Brandt A; Sanders R; Leighton R J Orthop Trauma; 2006; 20(10):663-7. PubMed ID: 17106375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nailing precision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing piriformis and trochanteric entry points for femoral antegrade nailing. Acevedo D; Suarez A; Checkley T; Fakhoury I; Reyes M; Constantinescu D; Hernandez GM Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jun; 144(6):2527-2538. PubMed ID: 38744693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of the femur: a prospective randomized comparison of piriformis fossa and greater trochanteric entry portals. Stannard JP; Bankston L; Futch LA; McGwin G; Volgas DA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(15):1385-91. PubMed ID: 21915543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of femoral intramedullary nailing in patients who are obese versus those who are not obese: a prospective multicenter comparison study. Tucker MC; Schwappach JR; Leighton RK; Coupe K; Ricci WM J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Sep; 21(8):523-9. PubMed ID: 17805018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing the Entry Point for Reconstruction Nailing of the Femur. Robles AS; Najdawi JJ; Wang J; Rockov ZA; Parikh HB; Little MTM; Marecek GS J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2023 Sep; 31(18):e721-e726. PubMed ID: 37205875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Anastopoulos G; Chissas D; Dourountakis J; Ntagiopoulos PG; Magnisalis E; Asimakopoulos A; Xenakis TA Injury; 2010 Mar; 41(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 20176170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antegrade versus retrograde nailing techniques and trochanteric versus piriformis intramedullary nailing entry points for femoral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hussain N; Hussain FN; Sermer C; Kamdar H; Schemitsch EH; Sternheim A; Kuzyk P Can J Surg; 2017 Feb; 60(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 28234586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical versus radiological method for adjusting rotational alignment during femoral shaft fractures intramedullary nailing and the malrotation impact on the functional outcomes: early results from a prospective cohort study. Abbas IM; Khalifa AA; Abubeih H; Mohamedean A; Farouk O J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Oct; 18(1):808. PubMed ID: 37898779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of infra-isthmal femoral fracture with an intramedullary nail: Is retrograde nailing a better option than antegrade nailing? Kim JW; Oh CW; Oh JK; Park KH; Kim HJ; Kim TS; Seo I; Park EK Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Sep; 138(9):1241-1247. PubMed ID: 29799078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of antegrade intramedullary nailing start site using the SIGN nail in proximal femoral fractures: A prospective cohort study. Mustafa Diab M; Wu HH; Eliezer E; Haonga B; Morshed S; Shearer DW Injury; 2018 Feb; 49(2):323-327. PubMed ID: 29162265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming: retrograde affords greater procedural efficiency than antegrade approach. Adesina SA; Amole IO; Oyewusi OO; Adefokun IG; Odekhiran EO; Adeniji DO; Adegoke AO; Ojo SA; Owolabi JI; Eyesan SU Int Orthop; 2023 Jul; 47(7):1845-1853. PubMed ID: 37140596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized comparative study of antegrade and retrograde locked nailing for middle humeral shaft fracture. Cheng HR; Lin J J Trauma; 2008 Jul; 65(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18580523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence of Varus Malalignment Post Interlocking Nail in Proximal Femur Shaft Fractures Comparing Two Types of Entry Points. Sadagatullah AN; Nazeeb MN; Ibrahim S Malays Orthop J; 2017 Nov; 11(3):31-35. PubMed ID: 29326763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intramedullary femoral nailing through the trochanteric fossa versus greater trochanter tip: a randomized controlled study with in-depth functional outcome results. Ansari Moein CM; Ten Duis HJ; Oey PL; de Kort GA; van der Meulen W; van der Werken C Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 26815474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antegrade intramedullary nailing of pediatric femoral fractures using an interlocking pediatric femoral nail and a lateral trochanteric entry point. Keeler KA; Dart B; Luhmann SJ; Schoenecker PL; Ortman MR; Dobbs MB; Gordon JE J Pediatr Orthop; 2009 Jun; 29(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 19461375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence of Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head After Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of 542 Cases. Kim JW; Oh JK; Byun YS; Shon OJ; Park JH; Oh HK; Shon HC; Park KC; Kim JJ; Lim SJ Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(5):e2728. PubMed ID: 26844518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]