These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38545134)
21. Use of Interarch Width Ratio to measure Transverse Relationship: A New Method to measure and assess Interarch Discrepancy. Batwa W; Baeshen HA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 29807960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of bonded rapid palatal expansion on the transverse dimensions of the maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Christie KF; Boucher N; Chung CH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S79-85. PubMed ID: 20381765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The effect of transverse dental compensation of camouflaged treatment in adult skeletal Class Ⅲ patients with width discrepancy using cone-beam CT]. Gu Y; Wang H; Wang L Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Feb; 28(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 31080997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography. Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions. Lux CJ; Conradt C; Burden D; Komposch G Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):674-85. PubMed ID: 14719732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of a maxillomandibular arch form based on the center of resistance of teeth using cone-beam computed tomography. Moon HW; Nam W; Ahn HW; Oh SH; Kook YA; Kim SH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 34753591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dental arch width in Class II Division 2 deep-bite malocclusion. Walkow TM; Peck S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 12490871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The coordination of bimaxillary alveolar arch widths in subjects with normal occlusion or posterior crossbite: A CBCT retrospective study. Luo L; Liu Q; Pan Y; Song Y; Li J; Cheng L; Zhao Z; Liu J Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Oct; 27(5):690-696. PubMed ID: 38581082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base width in Class III malocclusions with low, average and high MP-SN angles. Chen F; Terada K; Wu L; Saito I Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 17029532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Longitudinal comparisons of dental arch changes in normal and untreated Class II, Division 1 subjects and their clinical implications. Bishara SE; Bayati P; Jakobsen JR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Nov; 110(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 8922506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Maxillary transverse dimensions in subjects with and without impacted canines: A comparative cone-beam computed tomography study. Arboleda-Ariza N; Schilling J; Arriola-Guillén LE; Ruíz-Mora GA; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 30268260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion. Shu R; Han X; Wang Y; Xu H; Ai D; Wang L; Wu Y; Bai D Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 23458279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dental and skeletal changes in the upper and lower jaws after treatment with Schwarz appliances using cone-beam computed tomography. Tai K; Park JH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 21189775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Maxillary and mandibular arch widths of Colombians. Alvaran N; Roldan SI; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 19409348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion. Roberts WE; Viecilli RF; Chang C; Katona TR; Paydar NH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 26672700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of arch width among Class I normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion in Indian population. Patel D; Mehta F; Patel N; Mehta N; Trivedi I; Mehta A Contemp Clin Dent; 2015 Sep; 6(Suppl 1):S202-9. PubMed ID: 26604575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional relationship between the degree of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars angulation and the mandibular dental arch parameters: a cross-sectional comparative study. Haider O; Sharaf MA; Abdulqader AA; Alhashimi N; Sharhan HM; Chen C; Alsoufi W; Ting ZY; Wei XL; Alhammadi MS Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4301-4311. PubMed ID: 37184614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Staley RN; Stuntz WR; Peterson LC Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 3861102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]