These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38546219)

  • 21. Techniques and outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombosis: a systematic review of the literature.
    Campi R; Tellini R; Sessa F; Mari A; Cocci A; Greco F; Crestani A; Gomez Rivas J; Fiori C; Lapini A; Gallucci M; Capitanio U; Roupret M; Abaza R; Carini M; Serni S; Ficarra V; Porpiglia F; Esperto F; Minervini A;
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2019 Aug; 71(4):339-358. PubMed ID: 30957477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic and laparoscopic surgical techniques in patients with Crohn's disease.
    Hota S; Parascandola S; Smith S; Tampo MM; Amdur R; Obias V
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4602-4608. PubMed ID: 32789588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sun XY; Xu L; Lu JY; Zhang GN
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2019 Jun; 28(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 30688139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surgical complications occurring during minimally invasive sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer patients. A systematic review of the literature and metanalysis.
    Capozzi VA; Riemma G; Rosati A; Vargiu V; Granese R; Ercoli A; Cianci S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2142-2149. PubMed ID: 33820674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes.
    Guerra F; Giuliani G; Bencini L; Bianchi PP; Coratti A
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 117(7):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 29574729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: Robotic Surgery versus Laparoscopic Procedures for Esophageal Malignancy.
    Biebl M; Andreou A; Chopra S; Denecke C; Pratschke J
    Visc Med; 2018 Feb; 34(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29594164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Stapling Devices During Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Comparison.
    Holzmacher JL; Luka S; Aziz M; Amdur RL; Agarwal S; Obias V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Feb; 27(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 27893300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Letter to the editor concerning 'Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus thoracotomy for resectable stage II and III non-small-cell lung cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis' by Shen et al.
    Zhang J; Liu X
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Nov; 62(6):. PubMed ID: 36321978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kamarajah SK; Bundred J; Marc OS; Jiao LR; Manas D; Abu Hilal M; White SA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jan; 46(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 31409513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colon Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes-A Focus on Studies from 2020-2024.
    Negrut RL; Cote A; Caus VA; Maghiar AM
    Cancers (Basel); 2024 Apr; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 38672635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
    Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does Robotic Liver Surgery Enhance R0 Results in Liver Malignancies during Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery?-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Rahimli M; Perrakis A; Andric M; Stockheim J; Franz M; Arend J; Al-Madhi S; Abu Hilal M; Gumbs AA; Croner RS
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jul; 14(14):. PubMed ID: 35884421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Completeness of total mesorectum excision of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery: a review with a meta-analysis.
    Milone M; Manigrasso M; Velotti N; Torino S; Vozza A; Sarnelli G; Aprea G; Maione F; Gennarelli N; Musella M; De Palma GD
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Jun; 34(6):983-991. PubMed ID: 31056732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
    Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Simillis C; Lal N; Thoukididou SN; Kontovounisios C; Smith JJ; Hompes R; Adamina M; Tekkis PP
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jul; 270(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 30720507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Warrier SK; Heriot A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Jul; 36(7):1345-1356. PubMed ID: 33611619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive surgery for choledochal cysts: Laparoscopic versus robotic approaches.
    Yoon JH; Hwang HK; Lee WJ; Kang CM
    Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2021 Feb; 25(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 33649257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic, vaginal, and open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lenfant L; Canlorbe G; Belghiti J; Kreaden US; Hebert AE; Nikpayam M; Uzan C; Azaïs H
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2647-2662. PubMed ID: 37856058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual Occlusion During Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Contemporary Review of Methods to Reduce Laparoscopic and Robotic Lens Fogging and Other Sources of Optical Loss.
    Manning TG; Perera M; Christidis D; Kinnear N; McGrath S; O'Beirne R; Zotov P; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N
    J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(4):327-333. PubMed ID: 28075157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.