126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38546618)
1. Assessing Scar Outcomes Using Objective Scar Measurement Tools: An Adjunct to Validated Scar Evaluation Scales.
Bernabe RM; Madrigal P; Choe D; Pham C; Yenikomshian HA; Gillenwater J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38546618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to evaluate scar colour after burn injuries - A clinical comparison of the Mexameter® and the subjective scar assessment (POSAS/VSS).
Bagheri M; von Kohout M; Fuchs PC; Seyhan H; Stromps JP; Lefering R; Opländer C; Schiefer JL
Burns; 2024 Apr; 50(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 38097444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-and observer-reported long-term scar quality of wide local excision scars in melanoma patients.
Weitemeyer MB; Bramsen P; Klausen TW; Hölmich LR; Gjorup CA
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Dec; 52(6):319-324. PubMed ID: 30380964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of frequency of use of different scar assessment scales based on the scar condition and treatment method.
Bae SH; Bae YC
Arch Plast Surg; 2014 Mar; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 24665417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CO
Cox C; Bettiol P; Le A; MacKay BJ; Griswold J; McKee D
Scars Burn Heal; 2022; 8():20595131211047694. PubMed ID: 35003761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
Tyack Z; Simons M; Spinks A; Wasiak J
Burns; 2012 Feb; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.
Chae JK; Kim JH; Kim EJ; Park K
Ann Dermatol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):615-623. PubMed ID: 27746642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-related keloid scar assessment and outcome measures.
Nicholas RS; Falvey H; Lemonas P; Damodaran G; Ghannem A; Selim F; Navsaria H; Myers S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Mar; 129(3):648-656. PubMed ID: 22373972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Burn Scar Evaluation Using the Cutometer® MPA 580 in Comparison to "Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale" and "Vancouver Scar Scale".
Busche MN; Thraen AJ; Gohritz A; Rennekampff HO; Vogt PM
J Burn Care Res; 2018 Jun; 39(4):516-526. PubMed ID: 29596600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Evaluating Linear Scars after Thyroidectomy.
Chung JH; Kwon SH; Kim KJ; Lee JM; Yoon JM; Cheon JH; Yoon ES; Park SH
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2021 Jun; 34(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 33979825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurements of scar properties by SkinFibroMeter
Seo SR; Kang NO; Yoon MS; Lee HJ; Kim DH
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Aug; 23(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 27796064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Tuinebreijer WE; Middelkoop E; Kreis RW; van Zuijlen PP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. PubMed ID: 15253184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of vascularity in the scar: A systematic review.
Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1253-1265. PubMed ID: 30545695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
van de Kar AL; Corion LU; Smeulders MJ; Draaijers LJ; van der Horst CM; van Zuijlen PP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Detroit Keloid Scale: A Validated Tool for Rating Keloids.
Lyons AB; Ozog DM; Lim HW; Viola K; Tang A; Jones LR
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2023; 25(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 35394356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring vascularity of hypertrophic scars by dermoscopy: Construct validity and predictive ability of scar thickness change.
Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP; Li J
Skin Res Technol; 2020 May; 26(3):369-375. PubMed ID: 31916320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: Translation for portuguese language, cultural adaptation, and validation.
Lenzi L; Santos J; Raduan Neto J; Fernandes CH; Faloppa F
Int Wound J; 2019 Dec; 16(6):1513-1520. PubMed ID: 31599117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.
Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
