These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38546625)

  • 1. Speeded classification of visual events is sensitive to crossmodal intensity correspondence.
    Johansson RCG; Kelber P; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jun; 50(6):554-569. PubMed ID: 38546625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Del Gatto C; Spence C; Santangelo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):527-534. PubMed ID: 29116614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The size-brightness correspondence: evidence for crosstalk among aligned conceptual feature dimensions.
    Walker P; Walker L; Francis B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2694-710. PubMed ID: 26294420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation Affects Temporal Ventriloquism.
    Orchard-Mills E; Van der Burg E; Alais D
    Perception; 2016 Apr; 45(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 26655643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of cross-modal correspondences on working memory performance.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Mastroberardino S; Spence C; Santangelo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):819-831. PubMed ID: 28345948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overt spatial attention modulates multisensory selection.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):174-188. PubMed ID: 30589358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test.
    Parise CV; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 220(3-4):319-33. PubMed ID: 22706551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural basis of the crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visuospatial elevation.
    McCormick K; Lacey S; Stilla R; Nygaard LC; Sathian K
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():19-30. PubMed ID: 29501792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How many categories are there in crossmodal correspondences? A study based on exploratory factor analysis.
    Ohtake Y; Tanaka K; Yamamoto K
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294141. PubMed ID: 37963160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.
    Uno K; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):273-284. PubMed ID: 37932495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiovisual interactions in speeded discrimination of a visual event.
    Kaya U; Kafaligonul H
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Apr; 58(4):e13777. PubMed ID: 33483971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. It does belong together: cross-modal correspondences influence cross-modal integration during perceptual learning.
    Brunel L; Carvalho PF; Goldstone RL
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():358. PubMed ID: 25914653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Willmes K; Koch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 26813694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multisensory Integration Develops Prior to Crossmodal Recalibration.
    Rohlf S; Li L; Bruns P; Röder B
    Curr Biol; 2020 May; 30(9):1726-1732.e7. PubMed ID: 32197090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.