These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 385482)
1. Modern surgical and design considerations and clinical indications for subperiosteal implants. Judy KW; Weiss CM Implantologist; 1978 Aug; 1(3):113-37. PubMed ID: 385482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Template construction for accurate placement of intra-mucosal inserts. Massimei GG Implantologist; 1978 Aug; 1(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 385481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The mandibular subperiosteal implant and its evolution into a valuable prosthetic modality for the atrophic mandible. Byland JH Mo Dent J; 1985; 65(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 3887097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolutionary design trends in the mandibular subperiosteal implant. Linkow LI J Oral Implantol; 1984; 11(3):402-38. PubMed ID: 6394772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A modified technique from the complete mandibular subperiosteal implant. The anterior mandibular subperiosteal implant. Case report. Reiche O; Garg AK; Elias U; Mandell C Implant Soc; 1991; 2(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 1883897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthodontic reconstruction with the mandibular staple bone plate. Stines AV Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Apr; 30(2):189-205. PubMed ID: 3516737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ramus-endosseous, anterior-subperiosteal implant technique for the severely atrophic mandible. Byland JH J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 3519996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of the acutely atrophic mandible with a combined subperiosteal implant and bone graft. Golec TS; Cutri AA J Oral Implantol; 1982; 10(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 6759673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstruction of the edentulous mandible. Babbush CA Int Dent J; 1985 Dec; 35(4):266-76. PubMed ID: 3912328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified mandibular subperiosteal implant using inner bone system. Yuasa Y; Enomoto H; Yamane T; Ogata T J Oral Implantol; 1984; 11(3):348-70. PubMed ID: 6394770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Partial subperiosteal framework implants in the maxilla]. Duelund H Zahnarztl Prax; 1987 Mar; 38(3):88-90. PubMed ID: 3296544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Hydroxylapatite augmentation of the maxilla for denture wearing]. Fischer-Brandies E Zahnarzt; 1985 Dec; 29(12):850, 852, 854. PubMed ID: 3006403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Augmentation and overdenture prosthesis. Function and efficacy. Guerra LR J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 3031324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prosthetic problems following ridge augmentation with hydroxylapatite]. Camrda Z Zahnarzt; 1985 Nov; 29(11):809-12. PubMed ID: 3006402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Early load mandibular hybrid prosthesis using the Ohio State University acrylic frame requiring no final impression. Turkyilmaz I; Suarez JC; Company AM; McGlumphy EA Aust Dent J; 2009 Sep; 54(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 19709115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intramucosal implants. A review of concepts and techniques. Single inserts and tandem denserts. Evasic RW J Oral Implantol; 1982; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 7050401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Advanced surgical techniques to enhance implant success in the maxilla. Schuler RF; Roberts FA Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005; 17(10):697-704; quiz 706. PubMed ID: 16506611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]