These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3854892)
1. Living wills: personal and professional perspectives. Death at a New York hospital. Law Med Health Care; 1985 Dec; 13(6):260-82. PubMed ID: 3854892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices. Redleaf DL; Schmitt SB; Thompson WC Stanford Law Rev; 1979 May; 31(5):913-45. PubMed ID: 10243334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Of dead brains, living wills, and autonomy. Lehman LB Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1991 Jan; 26(1):39-42, 45-8. PubMed ID: 1898946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The living will-where it stands. Geriatr Nurs; 1985; 6(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 3843824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying. Hudson RP J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Indiana Living Will Act. Robinson RD; Shortridge DR Indiana Med; 1986 Aug; 79(8):694-5. PubMed ID: 3745903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Living with death: some legal considerations. Cohen KP Fam Community Health; 1979 Nov; 2(3):1-16. PubMed ID: 10244129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Living wills--moral directive can cause legal dilemma. Philipps KA Hosp Med Staff; 1978 May; 7(5):20-3. PubMed ID: 10236716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The choice to refuse to withhold medical treatment: the emerging technology and medical-ethical consensus. Clarke AM Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1981 May; 3(3):5-51. PubMed ID: 10295103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die? Denbo SM Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflicts between patients' wishes to forgo treatment and the policies of health care facilities. Miles SH; Singer PA; Siegler M N Engl J Med; 1989 Jul; 321(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 2733746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Brain death/termination of heroic efforts to save life--who decides? Ufford MR Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1980 Dec; 2(10):5-39. PubMed ID: 10295069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz. Carroll PR Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What are the basic provisions of California's new "Right to Die Bill?". Gordon PA Hosp Forum; 1976 Nov; 19(6):17, 22. PubMed ID: 10242087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives. Life and death decisions. McCormick K Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Feb; 43(7):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10291919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to die and the erosion of patient rights. Heintz LL Hawaii Med J; 1986 Apr; 45(4):103-4, 106-7, 114. PubMed ID: 3721851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Health care ethics--living-will legislation opposed: Massachusetts. Harrington T CHAC Rev; 1980; 8(3):22-3. PubMed ID: 10247852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Implications of New York's do-not-resuscitate law. McClung JA; Kamer RS N Engl J Med; 1990 Jul; 323(4):270-2. PubMed ID: 2078209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]