188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38549112)
1. An in-depth evaluation of metagenomic classifiers for soil microbiomes.
Edwin NR; Fitzpatrick AH; Brennan F; Abram F; O'Sullivan O
Environ Microbiome; 2024 Mar; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 38549112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From defaults to databases: parameter and database choice dramatically impact the performance of metagenomic taxonomic classification tools.
Wright RJ; Comeau AM; Langille MGI
Microb Genom; 2023 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 36867161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Struo2: efficient metagenome profiling database construction for ever-expanding microbial genome datasets.
Youngblut ND; Ley RE
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12198. PubMed ID: 34616633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contigs directed gene annotation (ConDiGA) for accurate protein sequence database construction in metaproteomics.
Wu E; Mallawaarachchi V; Zhao J; Yang Y; Liu H; Wang X; Shen C; Lin Y; Qiao L
Microbiome; 2024 Mar; 12(1):58. PubMed ID: 38504332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficient and Quality-Optimized Metagenomic Pipeline Designed for Taxonomic Classification in Routine Microbiological Clinical Tests.
Buffet-Bataillon S; Rizk G; Cattoir V; Sassi M; Thibault V; Del Giudice J; Gangneux JP
Microorganisms; 2022 Mar; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 35456762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benchmarking taxonomic classifiers with Illumina and Nanopore sequence data for clinical metagenomic diagnostic applications.
Govender KN; Eyre DW
Microb Genom; 2022 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 36269282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cultivation-independent genomes greatly expand taxonomic-profiling capabilities of mOTUs across various environments.
Ruscheweyh HJ; Milanese A; Paoli L; Karcher N; Clayssen Q; Keller MI; Wirbel J; Bork P; Mende DR; Zeller G; Sunagawa S
Microbiome; 2022 Dec; 10(1):212. PubMed ID: 36464731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shotgun metagenomics of soil invertebrate communities reflects taxonomy, biomass, and reference genome properties.
Schmidt A; Schneider C; Decker P; Hohberg K; Römbke J; Lehmitz R; Bálint M
Ecol Evol; 2022 Jul; 12(6):e8991. PubMed ID: 35784064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome.
Yap M; Feehily C; Walsh CJ; Fenelon M; Murphy EF; McAuliffe FM; van Sinderen D; O'Toole PW; O'Sullivan O; Cotter PD
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21665. PubMed ID: 33303873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of HiSeq3000 and BGISEQ-500 sequencing platform over whole genome sequencing metagenomics data.
Kumar A; Robertsen EM; Willassen NP; Fu J; Hjerde E
Genomics Inform; 2023 Dec; 21(4):e49. PubMed ID: 38224716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Microba Community Profiler for Taxonomic Profiling of Metagenomic Datasets From the Human Gut Microbiome.
Parks DH; Rigato F; Vera-Wolf P; Krause L; Hugenholtz P; Tyson GW; Wood DLA
Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():643682. PubMed ID: 33959106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of machine learning algorithms for taxonomic classification of marine metagenomes.
Park H; Lim SJ; Cosme J; O'Connell K; Sandeep J; Gayanilo F; Cutter GR; Montes E; Nitikitpaiboon C; Fisher S; Moustahfid H; Thompson LR
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Sep; 11(5):e0523722. PubMed ID: 37695074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets.
Portik DM; Brown CT; Pierce-Ward NT
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):541. PubMed ID: 36513983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes.
Peres da Silva R; Suphavilai C; Nagarajan N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Apr; 25(Suppl 1):153. PubMed ID: 38627615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The National Ecological Observatory Network's soil metagenomes: assembly and basic analysis.
Werbin ZR; Hackos B; Lopez-Nava J; Dietze MC; Bhatnagar JM
F1000Res; 2021; 10():299. PubMed ID: 35707452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju.
Menzel P; Ng KL; Krogh A
Nat Commun; 2016 Apr; 7():11257. PubMed ID: 27071849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating the impact of database choice on the accuracy of metagenomic read classification for the rumen microbiome.
Smith RH; Glendinning L; Walker AW; Watson M
Anim Microbiome; 2022 Nov; 4(1):57. PubMed ID: 36401288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrafast and accurate 16S rRNA microbial community analysis using Kraken 2.
Lu J; Salzberg SL
Microbiome; 2020 Aug; 8(1):124. PubMed ID: 32859275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concatenation of paired-end reads improves taxonomic classification of amplicons for profiling microbial communities.
Dacey DP; Chain FJJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Oct; 22(1):493. PubMed ID: 34641782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
