163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38550354)
1. Endoscopic Over Under Cartilage Tympanoplasty Is Not Inferior to Underlay Cartilage Tympanoplasty.
Erbele ID; Fink MR; Mankekar G; Son LS; Arriaga MA; Mehta R
Otol Neurotol Open; 2021 Dec; 1(2):e005. PubMed ID: 38550354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series.
Dornhoffer J
Laryngoscope; 2003 Nov; 113(11):1844-56. PubMed ID: 14603038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lateral-to-malleus underlay tympanoplasty: surgical technique and outcomes.
Yawn RJ; Carlson ML; Haynes DS; Rivas A
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1809-12. PubMed ID: 25058837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty: Anatomic and Functional Results.
Ulku CH
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jun; 70(2):235-239. PubMed ID: 29977847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The button graft technique for perforations affecting less than 25% of the tympanic membrane: a non-randomised comparison of a new modification to cartilage tympanoplasty with underlay and overlay grafts.
Abdelghany AM
Clin Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 38(3):208-16. PubMed ID: 23745532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inlay triple- "C" tympanoplasty: a comparative study for its use in large, marginal perforations.
Cohen-Vaizer M; Barzilai R; Shinnawi S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3715-3722. PubMed ID: 33108564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of endoscopic underlay and over-under tympanoplasty techniques for type I tympanoplasty.
Bao JW; Zhan KY; Wick CC
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 7(4):1186-1193. PubMed ID: 36000055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Success of cartilage grafting in revision tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy.
Boone RT; Gardner EK; Dornhoffer JL
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Sep; 25(5):678-81. PubMed ID: 15353995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Medial Underlay and Lateral Underlay Endoscopic Type I Tympanoplasty for Anterior Perforations of the Tympanic Membrane.
Choi SW; Kim H; Na HS; Lee JW; Lee S; Oh SJ; Kong SK
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Sep; 42(8):1177-1183. PubMed ID: 33661239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial.
Mauri M; Lubianca Neto JF; Fuchs SC
Laryngoscope; 2001 Aug; 111(8):1479-85. PubMed ID: 11568587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty.
Demirpehlivan IA; Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Songu M; Ciger E; Can N
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 268(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 21267588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with double layer graft (modified sandwich fascia) technique and single layer graft (underlay fascia and underlay cartilage) technique.
Nemade SV; Shinde KJ; Sampate PB
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28855058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Homograft tympanoplasty in perspective. A long-term clinical-histologic study of formalin-fixed tympanic membranes used for the reconstruction of 125 severely damaged middle ears.
Lesinski SG
Laryngoscope; 1983 Nov; 93(11 Pt 2 Suppl 32):1-37. PubMed ID: 6633129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic tympanoplasty with inlay cartilage graft in an university hospital.
Pontes-Madruga TC; Nogueira Neto FB; Suzuki FAB; Testa JRG; Onishi ET
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2021; 87(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 31874832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of clinical outcomes between butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty.
Kim MB; Park JA; Suh MJ; Song CI
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Apr; 46(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 30017235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cartilage palisades in type III tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional long-term results.
Bernal-Sprekelsen M; Romaguera Lliso MD; Sanz Gonzalo JJ
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 12544026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Type III tympanoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis: anatomic and functional results.
Iñiguez-Cuadra R; Alobid I; Borés-Domenech A; Menéndez-Colino LM; Caballero-Borrego M; Bernal-Sprekelsen M
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):409-14. PubMed ID: 20042992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does cartilage tympanoplasty impair hearing in patients with normal preoperative hearing? A comparison of different techniques.
Balcı MK; İşlek A; Ciğer E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 276(3):673-677. PubMed ID: 30600345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. To detach or not to detach the umbo in type I tympanoplasty: functional results.
Lotto C; Fink R; Stricker D; Fernandez IJ; Beckmann S; Presutti L; Caversaccio M; Molinari G; Anschuetz L
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):2871-2876. PubMed ID: 38105363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of endoscopic transcanal type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty.
Özdemir D; Özgür A; Akgül G; Çelebi M; Mehel DM; Yemiş T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 276(12):3295-3299. PubMed ID: 31520162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
