These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38551533)

  • 1. Deep Learning-Derived Myocardial Strain.
    Kwan AC; Chang EW; Jain I; Theurer J; Tang X; Francisco N; Haddad F; Liang D; Fábián A; Ferencz A; Yuan N; Merkely B; Siegel R; Cheng S; Kovács A; Tokodi M; Ouyang D
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jul; 17(7):715-725. PubMed ID: 38551533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Global longitudinal strain software upgrade: Implications for intervendor consistency and longitudinal imaging studies.
    Castel AL; Menet A; Ennezat PV; Delelis F; Le Goffic C; Binda C; Guerbaai RA; Levy F; Graux P; Tribouilloy C; Maréchaux S
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Jan; 109(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26514326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT-derived left ventricular global strain: a head-to-head comparison with speckle tracking echocardiography.
    Ammon F; Bittner D; Hell M; Mansour H; Achenbach S; Arnold M; Marwan M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 30953252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of the variability associated with repeat measurements of left ventricular two-dimensional global longitudinal strain in a real-world setting.
    Costa SP; Beaver TA; Rollor JL; Vanichakarn P; Magnus PC; Palac RT
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jan; 27(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 24120317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility and Intervendor Agreement of Left Ventricular Global Systolic Strain in Children Using a Layer-Specific Analysis.
    Ramlogan S; Aly D; France R; Schmidt S; Hinzman J; Sherman A; Goudar SP; Forsha D
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2020 Jan; 33(1):110-119. PubMed ID: 31668503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards standardized postprocessing of global longitudinal strain by feature tracking - OptiStrain CMR-FT study.
    Heinke R; Pathan F; Le M; D'Angelo T; Winau L; Arendt C; Vogl TJ; Zeiher A; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Nov; 19(1):267. PubMed ID: 31775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intervendor variability of two-dimensional strain using vendor-specific and vendor-independent software.
    Nagata Y; Takeuchi M; Mizukoshi K; Wu VC; Lin FC; Negishi K; Nakatani S; Otsuji Y
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Jun; 28(6):630-41. PubMed ID: 25747915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intervendor consistency and reproducibility of left ventricular 2D global and regional strain with two different high-end ultrasound systems.
    Shiino K; Yamada A; Ischenko M; Khandheria BK; Hudaverdi M; Speranza V; Harten M; Benjamin A; Hamilton-Craig CR; Platts DG; Burstow DJ; Scalia GM; Chan J
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 18(6):707-716. PubMed ID: 27330151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability and Reproducibility of Segmental Longitudinal Strain Measurement: A Report From the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.
    Mirea O; Pagourelias ED; Duchenne J; Bogaert J; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU;
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 28528147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast-enhanced echocardiographic measurement of longitudinal strain: accuracy and its relationship with image quality.
    Karagodin I; Genovese D; Kruse E; Patel AR; Rashedi N; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 36(3):431-439. PubMed ID: 31720940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of left ventricular manual versus automated derived longitudinal strain: implications for clinical practice and research.
    Kobayashi Y; Ariyama M; Kobayashi Y; Giraldeau G; Fleischman D; Kozelj M; Vrtovec B; Ashley E; Kuznetsova T; Schnittger I; Liang D; Haddad F
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 26578468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multilayer global longitudinal strain in patients with cancer: A comparison of two vendors.
    Ancedy Y; Ederhy S; Lang S; Hollebecque A; Dufour LS; Adavane-Scheuble S; Etienney A; Chauvet M; Soria JC; Cohen A
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018 Apr; 111(4):285-296. PubMed ID: 29422386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility of Layer-Specific Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements Among Five Different Vendors: A Report from the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.
    Ünlü S; Mirea O; Duchenne J; Pagourelias ED; Bézy S; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Mar; 31(3):374-380.e1. PubMed ID: 29246512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement.
    Erley J; Genovese D; Tapaskar N; Alvi N; Rashedi N; Besser SA; Kawaji K; Goyal N; Kelle S; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V; Patel AR
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Aug; 21(1):46. PubMed ID: 31391036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Echocardiographic measures of myocardial deformation by speckle-tracking technologies: the need for standardization?
    Nelson MR; Hurst RT; Raslan SF; Cha S; Wilansky S; Lester SJ
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Nov; 25(11):1189-94. PubMed ID: 22981227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement of two vendor-independent strain analysis software platforms in assessing left ventricular global longitudinal strain.
    Rhee TM; Kim HK; Choi YJ; Lee HJ; Hwang IC; Yoon YE; Kim HL; Park JB; Lee SP; Kim YJ; Cho GY
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Sep; 38(9):1939-1950. PubMed ID: 37726615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements from Contrast-Enhanced Echocardiographic Images.
    Medvedofsky D; Lang RM; Kruse E; Guile B; Weinert L; Ciszek B; Jacobson Z; Negron J; Volpato V; Prado A; Patel AR; Mor-Avi V
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Mar; 31(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 29174339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multi-vendor, multi-center study on reproducibility and comparability of fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
    Erley J; Zieschang V; Lapinskas T; Demir A; Wiesemann S; Haass M; Osman NF; Simonetti OP; Liu Y; Patel AR; Mor-Avi V; Unal O; Johnson KM; Pieske B; Hansmann J; Schulz-Menger J; Kelle S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 May; 36(5):899-911. PubMed ID: 32056087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single Versus Standard Multiview Assessment of Global Longitudinal Strain for the Diagnosis of Cardiotoxicity During Cancer Therapy.
    Thavendiranathan P; Negishi T; Coté MA; Penicka M; Massey R; Cho GY; Hristova K; Vinereanu D; Popescu BA; Izumo M; Negishi K; Marwick TH;
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Aug; 11(8):1109-1118. PubMed ID: 29778856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Measurement of Left Ventricular Strain in Echocardiography.
    Salte IM; Østvik A; Smistad E; Melichova D; Nguyen TM; Karlsen S; Brunvand H; Haugaa KH; Edvardsen T; Lovstakken L; Grenne B
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Oct; 14(10):1918-1928. PubMed ID: 34147442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.