These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3855347)

  • 21. The influence of sagittal position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception.
    Sena LMF; Damasceno E Araújo LAL; Farias ACR; Pereira HSG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 28658359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Facial appearance and attachment in infants with orofacial clefts: a replication.
    Coy K; Speltz ML; Jones K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Jan; 39(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 11772172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of a brown subject displaying different degrees of lip projection or retrusion, in the city of Salvador/Bahia.
    Carneiro EN; Pithon MM; Machado AW; Braga E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):62-67. PubMed ID: 29898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gender-specific evaluation of variation of maxillary exposure when smiling.
    Pausch NC; Katsoulis D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):913-920. PubMed ID: 28431806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate Is Not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness.
    Kocher K; Kowalski P; Kolokitha OE; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e45-52. PubMed ID: 25932752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Facial attractiveness of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and of controls assessed by laypersons and professionals.
    Eichenberger M; Staudt CB; Pandis N; Gnoinski W; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 23832974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor angulation.
    Wolfart S; Brunzel S; Freitag S; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 15119864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of tooth colour on the perceptions of age and social judgements.
    Newton JT; Subramanian SS; Westland S; Gupta AK; Luo W; Joiner A
    J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103771. PubMed ID: 34363891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior.
    Chen J; Zhong J; Zhang Y; Li P; Zhang A; Tan Q; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 517(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22410307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the influence of dental and facial aesthetics in determining overall attractiveness.
    Prasad KN; Sabrish S; Mathew S; Shivamurthy PG; Pattabiraman V; Sagarkar R
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):684-697. PubMed ID: 30385289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Social perceptions of adults wearing orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional study.
    Jeremiah HG; Bister D; Newton JT
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 20651044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Smile attractiveness of patients treated for congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors as rated by dentists, laypersons, and the patients themselves.
    De-Marchi LM; Pini NI; Ramos AL; Pascotto RC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 24725615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Face perception in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and patients with severe Class III malocclusion compared to controls.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Kochel J; Boehm H; Linz C; Klammert U; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 39(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 20580240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of canine characteristics and symmetry on perceived smile attractiveness when canine teeth are substituted for lateral incisors.
    Rayner WJ; Barber SK; Spencer RJ
    J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 42(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 25808380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using artificial intelligence to determine the influence of dental aesthetics on facial attractiveness in comparison to other facial modifications.
    Obwegeser D; Timofte R; Mayer C; Eliades T; Bornstein MM; Schätzle MA; Patcas R
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Aug; 44(4):445-451. PubMed ID: 35532375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: an experimental study.
    Tobiasen JM; Hiebert JM
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Jan; 30(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 8418877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can a new smile make you look more intelligent and successful?
    Beall AE
    Dent Clin North Am; 2007 Apr; 51(2):289-97, vii. PubMed ID: 17532913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern.
    Oh JH; Park JH; Cho HJ; Seo HY; Chae JM
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.