BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3855392)

  • 1. Function following mega total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty and healthy matched controls.
    Johnsson R; Carlsson A; Kisch K; Moritz U; Zetterström R; Persson BM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985; (192):159-67. PubMed ID: 3855392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant survival after primary total hip arthroplasty due to childhood hip disorders: results from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry.
    Thillemann TM; Pedersen AB; Johnsen SP; Søballe K;
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):769-76. PubMed ID: 19085493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term roentgenographic evaluation of proximal femur prosthesis after tumor resection.
    Donati D; Albisinni U; Zavatta M; Gozzi E; Giacomini S; Mercuri M
    Chir Organi Mov; 2004; 89(3):191-203. PubMed ID: 15751586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Exchange of endoprosthesis using a proximal femur resection prosthesis].
    Fromm B; Bläsius K; Graf J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1995; 133(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7886995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Kotz modular prosthesis in massive osteo-articular resections for bone tumours: preliminary results in 27 cases.
    Capanna R; Guerra A,; Ruggieri P; Biagini R; Campanacci M
    Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1985 Sep; 11(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 3003010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoprosthetic replacement for primary malignant tumors of the proximal femur.
    Kabukcuoglu Y; Grimer RJ; Tillman RM; Carter SR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jan; (358):8-14. PubMed ID: 9973971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals.
    Flugsrud GB; Nordsletten L; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Meyer HE
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Feb; 78(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 17453400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
    Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of a cementless femoral component for the management of bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Michelinakis E; Papapolychronlou T; Vafiadis J
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1996; 55(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8771351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Management of the bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Wang Y; Zhou YG
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 43(20):1309-12. PubMed ID: 16271241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total hip arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fractures using a cementless tapered femoral stem.
    Klein GR; Parvizi J; Vegari DN; Rothman RH; Purtill JJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1134-40. PubMed ID: 17162172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Resection hip arthroplasty--mid- and long-term results].
    Hudec T; Jahoda D; Sosna A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 16316603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision of failed total hip prosthesis with insertion of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component.
    Casas-Sabater J; Cots-Pons M; Castillo-García F; Ries ED; Rodriguez-Miralles J
    Surg Technol Int; 2002 Sep; 10():212-9. PubMed ID: 12384884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferior outcome after intraoperative femoral fracture in total hip arthroplasty: outcome in 519 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry.
    Thillemann TM; Pedersen AB; Johnsen SP; Søballe K
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Jun; 79(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 18622835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the R.M. isoelastic prosthesis.
    Matricali GA; Thibaut H; Hendrickx M; Thibaut R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():374-6. PubMed ID: 8116434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional outcome of femoral peri prosthetic fracture and revision hip arthroplasty: a matched-pair study from the New Zealand Registry.
    Young SW; Walker CG; Pitto RP
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Aug; 79(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 18766480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.