133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38554354)
21. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.
Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z
Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.
Perry R; Barbosa JP; Perry I; Barbosa J
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):125. PubMed ID: 38492067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Chao YK; Li ZG; Wen YW; Kim DJ; Park SY; Chang YL; van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
Trials; 2019 Jun; 20(1):346. PubMed ID: 31182150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.
Li Z; Li JP; Qin X; Xu BB; Han YD; Liu SD; Zhu WZ; Peng MZ; Lin Q
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(37):10675-82. PubMed ID: 26457028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of training pathway to reach expert performance levels based on proficiency-based progression in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
Müller DT; Brunner S; Straatman J; Babic B; Eckhoff JA; Reisewitz A; Storms C; Schiffmann LM; Schmidt T; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7305-7316. PubMed ID: 37580580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Hua R; Yang Y; He Y; Ye B; Guo X; Sun Y; Li Z
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jun; 33(6):. PubMed ID: 31608939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Berlth F; Poplawski A; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Müller-Stich BP; Ruurda JP; Schiesser M; Schneider PM; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1060. PubMed ID: 34565343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.
Sarkaria IS; Rizk NP; Goldman DA; Sima C; Tan KS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Molena D; Bott M; Atkinson T; Jones DR; Rusch VW
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Sep; 108(3):920-928. PubMed ID: 31026433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.
Yamashita K; Makino T; Yamasaki M; Tanaka K; Hara T; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1-8. PubMed ID: 28881906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution.
Ekeke CN; Kuiper GM; Luketich JD; Ruppert KM; Copelli SJ; Baker N; Levy RM; Awais O; Christie NA; Dhupar R; Pennathur A; Sarkaria IS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 166(2):374-382.e1. PubMed ID: 36732144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic versus open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate.
Weindelmayer J; De Pasqual CA; Turolo C; Gervasi MC; Sacco M; Bencivenga M; Giacopuzzi S
J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1109-1115. PubMed ID: 36971002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison of the lymph node dissection and complications between video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) esophagectomy and conventional esophagectomy via right thoracotomic].
Mao Y; He J; Zhang Z; Dong J; Gao S; Sun K; Cheng G; Mu J; Xue Q; Liu X; Fang D; Wang D; Zhao J; Li J; Wang Y; Gao Y; Huang J
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 37(7):530-3. PubMed ID: 26463331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Initial results of robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Trugeda Carrera MS; Fernández-Díaz MJ; Rodríguez-Sanjuán JC; Manuel-Palazuelos JC; de Diego García EM; Gómez-Fleitas M
Cir Esp; 2015; 93(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 25794776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term survival outcomes associated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
Byiringiro I; Aurit SJ; Nandipati KC
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):4018-4027. PubMed ID: 36097100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
