BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3856026)

  • 1. Evaluation of condylar position from temporomandibular joint radiographs.
    Aquilino SA; Matteson SR; Holland GA; Phillips C
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jan; 53(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 3856026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcranial radiography and linear tomography: a comparative study.
    Knoernschild KL; Aquilino SA; Ruprecht A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 1774686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achieving improved visualization of the temporomandibular joint condyle and fossa in the sagittal cephalogram and a pilot study of their relationships in habitual occlusion.
    Braun S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jun; 109(6):635-8. PubMed ID: 8659473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of the radiographic position of the temporomandibular joint disk.
    Heffez L; Jordan S; Going R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Mar; 65(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 3162575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of mandibular condyle position: a comparison of transcranial radiographs and linear tomograms.
    Pullinger A; Hollender L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Sep; 60(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 3862048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practical evaluation of the lateral temporomandibular joint radiograph.
    Weinberg LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 May; 51(5):676-85. PubMed ID: 6587091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analytic method for evaluating condylar position in the TMJ and its application to orthodontic patients with painful clicking.
    Sakuda M; Tanne K; Tanaka E; Takasugi H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jan; 101(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 1731494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced joint distance during TMJ movement in the posterior condylar position.
    Yang HJ; Kim DS; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):e159-64. PubMed ID: 23465637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporomandibular joint and normal occlusion: Is there anything singular about it? A computed tomographic evaluation.
    Vitral RW; da Silva Campos MJ; Rodrigues AF; Fraga MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jul; 140(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 21724082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between condylar position, joint morphology and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic patients without temporomandibular joint disorders.
    Kikuchi K; Takeuchi S; Tanaka E; Shibaguchi T; Tanne K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1070-5. PubMed ID: 14641670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporomandibular joint space analysis.
    Cederberg RA
    Cranio; 1994 Jul; 12(3):172; discussion 177-8. PubMed ID: 7813029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of horizontal condylar angle and x-ray projection angle on the appearance of the condyle on lateral temporomandibular joint panoramic radiographs.
    Beloor Vasudeva S; Kameko N; Endo A; Okano T
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2012 Dec; 11(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 23208594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new approach to improve TMJ morphological information from plain film radiographs.
    Dias GJ; Premachandra IM; Mahoney PM; Kieser JA
    Cranio; 2005 Jan; 23(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 15727319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is orthopantomography reliable for TMJ diagnosis? An experimental study on a dry skull.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    J Orofac Pain; 1995; 9(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 8995908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Panoramic imaging of the temporomandibular joint: an experimental study using cadaveric skulls.
    Fallon SD; Fritz GW; Laskin DM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 16413893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laminagraphic study of mandibular condyle position when recording centric relation.
    Williamson EH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 May; 39(5):561-4. PubMed ID: 274551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative and subjective analysis of temporomandibular joint radiographs.
    Smith SR; Matteson SR; Phillips C; Tyndall DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 2585313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Alterations in the size, shape and position of the condylar surfaces in the orthopantomograph. In vitro study].
    Tsiklakis K; Patsakas AI; Pierrakou ED
    Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Mar; 4(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 2640647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic study of condylar position in centric relation and centric occlusion.
    Ismail YH; Rokni A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Mar; 43(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 6928201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A radiographic study of condyle position at various depths of cut in dry skulls with axially corrected lateral tomograms.
    Pandis N; Karpac J; Trevino R; Williams B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Aug; 100(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 1867162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.