These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38561322)

  • 21. The impact of stimulus format on task inhibition during task switching.
    Sdoia S; Zivi P; Ferlazzo F
    Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2185-2194. PubMed ID: 35015110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When less is more: costs and benefits of varied vs. fixed content and structure in short-term task switching training.
    Sabah K; Dolk T; Meiran N; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1531-1542. PubMed ID: 29623409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming].
    Martin S; Brouillet D; Guerdoux E; Tarrago R
    Encephale; 2006; 32(2 Pt 1):253-62. PubMed ID: 16910627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Altered proactive control in adults with ADHD: Evidence from event-related potentials during cued task switching.
    Sidlauskaite J; Dhar M; Sonuga-Barke E; Wiersema JR
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107330. PubMed ID: 31887312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How positive affect modulates proactive control: reduced usage of informative cues under positive affect with low arousal.
    Fröber K; Dreisbach G
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():265. PubMed ID: 22866047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No pupillometric evidence for effortful proactive control in the proportion-congruent Stroop paradigm.
    Hasshim N; Carruthers M; Ferrand L; Augustinova M; Parris BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Mar; ():17470218241235671. PubMed ID: 38360562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Consistent use of proactive control and relation with academic achievement in childhood.
    Kubota M; Hadley LV; Schaeffner S; Könen T; Meaney JA; Auyeung B; Morey CC; Karbach J; Chevalier N
    Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104329. PubMed ID: 32526518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impaired proactive control in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder: Evidence from ERPs.
    Su B; Zheng M
    J Psychiatr Res; 2023 Apr; 160():47-55. PubMed ID: 36774830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Training and Transfer of Cue Updating in Older Adults Is Limited: Evidence From Behavioral and Neuronal Data.
    Kray J; Ferdinand NK; Stenger K
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():565927. PubMed ID: 33343316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training.
    Sabah K; Dolk T; Meiran N; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1473-1487. PubMed ID: 32303843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses.
    Ball BH; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):793-811. PubMed ID: 29239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E; Calandruccio L; Oleson J; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Developing adaptive control: Age-related differences in task choices and awareness of proactive and reactive control demands.
    Niebaum JC; Chevalier N; Guild RM; Munakata Y
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 21(3):561-572. PubMed ID: 33009653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Metacognitive processes in executive control development: the case of reactive and proactive control.
    Chevalier N; Martis SB; Curran T; Munakata Y
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 27(6):1125-36. PubMed ID: 25603026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Social exclusion modulates dual mechanisms of cognitive control: Evidence from ERPs.
    Xu M; Li Z; Qi S; Fan L; Zhou X; Yang D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jul; 41(10):2669-2685. PubMed ID: 32491264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transfer of Learned Cognitive Flexibility to Novel Stimuli and Task Sets.
    Wen T; Geddert RM; Madlon-Kay S; Egner T
    Psychol Sci; 2023 Apr; 34(4):435-454. PubMed ID: 36693129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm.
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16397812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ocular signatures of proactive versus reactive cognitive control in young adults.
    Mäki-Marttunen V; Hagen T; Aminihajibashi S; Foldal M; Stavrinou M; Halvorsen JH; Laeng B; Espeseth T
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 18(5):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 29992484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.