These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38561598)

  • 1. Robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion: A two-center comparative study of Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis.
    Kadoriku F; Sasaki Y; Fukuta K; Nishiyama M; Utsunomiya S; Kobayashi S; Shiozaki K; Daizumoto K; Ueno Y; Seto K; Tomida R; Kusuhara Y; Fukawa T; Nakanishi R; Yamaguchi K; Yamamoto Y; Izaki H; Takahashi M; Furukawa J
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Apr; 17(2):e13307. PubMed ID: 38561598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients undergoing urinary diversion for bladder cancer.
    Kouba E; Sands M; Lentz A; Wallen E; Pruthi RS
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):945-8; discussion 948-9. PubMed ID: 17632159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technique selection of bricker or wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in ileal conduit urinary diversion: a strategy based on patient characteristics.
    Liu L; Chen M; Li Y; Wang L; Qi F; Dun J; Chen J; Zu X; Qi L
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):2808-12. PubMed ID: 24590436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ureteroenteric strictures: a single center experience comparing Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients after urinary diversion for bladder cancer.
    Christoph F; Herrmann F; Werthemann P; Janik T; Schostak M; Klopf C; Weikert S
    BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):100. PubMed ID: 31651306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis.
    Al-Nader M; Krafft U; Hess J; Kesch C; AbdelRazek M; Abolyosr A; Alsagheer GA; Mohamed O; Fathi A; Tschirdewahn S; Hadaschik BA; Mahmoud O
    Int J Urol; 2024 Jul; 31(7):813-818. PubMed ID: 38644653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybrid technique has lower stricture rates than Wallace and Bricker.
    Can O; Danış E; Kutlutürk EG; Polat EC; Ötünçtemur A
    Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 52():102036. PubMed ID: 38198985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ureteroileal anastomosis stricture after urinary diversions performed by open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Incidence and management in a tertiary care center.
    Alonso Mediavilla E; Campos-Juanatey F; Azcárraga Aranegui G; Varea Malo R; Ballestero Diego R; Domínguez Esteban M; Ramos Barseló E; Zubillaga Guerrero S; Calleja Hermosa P; Gutiérrez Baños JL
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022; 46(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 34838493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrosigmoid Versus Traditional Ileal Conduit for Urinary Diversion After Radical Cystectomy.
    Ficarra V; Giannarini G; Crestani A; Palumbo V; Rossanese M; Valotto C; Inferrera A; Pansadoro V
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 30091420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Degree of renal insufficiency in patients undergoing ileal conduit as a form of urinary diversion in relation to the type of ureteral insertion].
    Dzamić ZM; Kajmaković BM; Pejcić T; Milković B; Aćimović M; Djurasić Lj; Djokić JH
    Acta Chir Iugosl; 2013; 60(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24669563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wallace direct versus anti-reflux Le Duc ureteroileal anastomosis: comparative analysis in modified Studer orthotopic neobladder reconstruction.
    Shigemura K; Yamanaka N; Imanishi O; Yamashita M
    Int J Urol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 22004164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of Bricker versus Wallace ureteroenteric anastomosis and identification of predictors for postoperative ureteroenteric stricture.
    Krafft U; Mahmoud O; Hess J; Radtke JP; Panic A; Püllen L; Darr C; Kesch C; Szarvas T; Rehme C; Hadaschik BA; Tschirdewahn S
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 May; 407(3):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 34940890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A modified ureteroileal anastomosis technique for Bricker urinary diversion.
    Li Y; Zhuang Q; Hu Z; Wang Z; Zhu H; Ye Z
    Urology; 2011 Nov; 78(5):1191-5. PubMed ID: 21890180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of robot-assisted totally intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal conduit urinary diversion: initial results of a single institutional pilot study.
    Balaji KC; Yohannes P; McBride CL; Oleynikov D; Hemstreet GP
    Urology; 2004 Jan; 63(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 14751347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical technique of uretero-ileal anastomosis in patients with bilateral duplex ureters undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: initial experience.
    Petar K; Marko A; Almir R; Marko V
    Acta Chir Belg; 2021 Aug; 121(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 33910483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduit: Marionette technique and initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute.
    Guru K; Seixas-Mikelus SA; Hussain A; Blumenfeld AJ; Nyquist J; Chandrasekhar R; Wilding GE
    Urology; 2010 Oct; 76(4):866-71. PubMed ID: 20451963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is it necessary to perform a retrosigmoid transposition of the left ureter in Bricker Ileal Conduit surgery?
    Wang J; Tuo Z; Gao M; Min J; Wang Y; Zhang T; Yu D; Bi L
    BMC Urol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):116. PubMed ID: 35897097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of modified Taguchi and Bricker ureteral reimplantation techniques after radical cystectomy.
    Lee CT; Chen BT; Gong E; Hafez KS; Sheffield JH; Montie JE
    Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 15533482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bricker versus Wallace anastomosis: A meta-analysis of ureteroenteric stricture rates after ileal conduit urinary diversion.
    Davis NF; Burke JP; McDermott T; Flynn R; Manecksha RP; Thornhill JA
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2015; 9(5-6):E284-90. PubMed ID: 26029296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modified ureteroileal anastomosis can reduce ureteroileal anastomotic stricture after ileal conduit.
    Liang H; Sun H; Chen J
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2024 Jul; 56(7):2235-2241. PubMed ID: 38347248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bricker's ileal conduit urinary diversion with a simple non-refluxing uretero ileal anastomosis.
    Bernstein IT; Bennicke K; Rørdam P; Klarskov P; Iversen HG
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1991; 25(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 2047769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.