BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38561938)

  • 1. Comparison of 3D Easy Box cone-beam computed tomography analysis with 2D Modified Easy Box on OPG as a prognostic tool for impacted maxillary canines: A pilot study.
    Dias R; Kanungo H; Gupta M; Mishra K; Soni A; Jaiswal A
    J Orthod; 2024 Apr; ():14653125241242138. PubMed ID: 38561938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of a new prognostic tool for impacted maxillary canines, 'Easy box': A cone-beam computed tomographic study.
    P MS; Sundareswaran S; Mohammed F; Jisha B
    J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 50(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 36113095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 2D OPG image versus orthopantomogram from 3D CBCT from the forensic point of view.
    Eliasova H; Dostalova T; Prochazka A; Sediva E; Horacek M; Urbanova P; Hlinakova P
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2021 Feb; 48():101802. PubMed ID: 33478657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and two-dimensional imaging methods in the 3D localization and assessment of maxillary impacted canines compared to the gold standard in-vivo readings: A cross-sectional study.
    Alfailany DT; Shaweesh AI; Hajeer MY; Brad B; Alhaffar JB
    Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100780. PubMed ID: 37290351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT-based interpretations of maxillary impacted canines compared to those of conventional radiography: An in vitro study.
    Hajeer MY; Al-Homsi HK; Alfailany DT; Murad RMT
    Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100639. PubMed ID: 35606269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis.
    Wriedt S; Jaklin J; Al-Nawas B; Wehrbein H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Jan; 73(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 22246048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.
    Alqerban A; Willems G; Bernaerts C; Vangastel J; Politis C; Jacobs R
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 24406479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Evaluation of Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography- and Two Dimensional-based Interpretations of Maxillary Canine Impactions using a Panel of Orthodontically Trained Observers.
    Al-Homsi HK; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Aug; 16(8):648-56. PubMed ID: 26423501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. KPG index versus OPG measurements: a comparison between 3D and 2D methods in predicting treatment duration and difficulty level for patients with impacted maxillary canines.
    Dalessandri D; Migliorati M; Visconti L; Contardo L; Kau CH; Martin C
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():537620. PubMed ID: 25126566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Conventional Orthodontic Imaging Modalities for Localization of Impacted Maxillary Canines in Patients With Alveolar Cleft.
    Padisar P; Tofangchiha M; Salari B; Oveisi S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Feb; 58(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 32783463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The diagnostic value of orthopantomograms in detecting resorption of lateral incisors associated with ectopic canines: a CBCT study.
    Hershaw CM; Mhani N; Brown A
    J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 34407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Will supplemental cone beam computed tomography change the treatment plan of impacted maxillary canines based on 2D radiography? A prospective clinical study.
    Stoustrup P; Videbæk A; Wenzel A; Matzen LH
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 37934968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines.
    Haney E; Gansky SA; Lee JS; Johnson E; Maki K; Miller AJ; Huang JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 20451777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Localization of impacted maxillary canines using cone beam computed tomography. Review of the literature.
    Rossini G; Cavallini C; Cassetta M; Galluccio G; Barbato E
    Ann Stomatol (Roma); 2012 Jan; 3(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22783450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation of teeth by conventional panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images - A cross-sectional study.
    Barakaat AA; Maaz M; Sukhia RH; Fida M
    Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100757. PubMed ID: 37163932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of impacted canines' localization and adjacent lateral incisors' root resorption with orthopantomography and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Akkuc S; Duruk G; Duman S
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):476-486. PubMed ID: 32949336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional orthodontic radiographic modalities and cone-beam computed tomography for localization of impacted maxillary canine teeth.
    Salari B; Tofangchiha M; Padisar P; Reda R; Zanza A; Testarelli L
    Sci Prog; 2024; 107(1):368504241228077. PubMed ID: 38359866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of neighbouring teeth: a study assessing the diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in two groups of observers.
    Lai CS; Suter VG; Katsaros C; Bornstein MM
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 24123189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Anatomical Depictions in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Reconstructed Panoramic Projections Compared to Conventional Panoramic Radiographs: A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis.
    Jadhav A; Desai NG; Tadinada A
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e44723. PubMed ID: 37809250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.