These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3856216)

  • 1. Detailed evaluation of six Class 2 amalgam restorations.
    Mjör IA; Smith DC
    Oper Dent; 1985; 10(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 3856216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality control in amalgam restorations. I. A standardized method for the evaluation of class I and class II restorations].
    van Amerongen WE
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1982 May; 89(5):205-9. PubMed ID: 6955624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: two year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 49(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 6344966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of methods for evaluating the marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW; Mahler DB; Engle JH
    Dent Mater; 1985 Dec; 1(6):235-7. PubMed ID: 3868633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control of amalgam restorations. Part II. A comparison of four non-clinical methods of evaluation.
    Borgmeyer PJ; Advokaat JG; Akerboom HB
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1983; 90(Suppl 22):24-43. PubMed ID: 6590976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study on the effect of various polishing materials on the surface of amalgam restorations.
    Zaazou AM; Hassanein el-S ; Nasr Y; Bakry S
    Egypt Dent J; 1976 Oct; 22(4):79-90. PubMed ID: 1071988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical evaluation of the quality of amalgam, acrylic and cast restorations. Results of a pilot study].
    Pieper K; Motsch A; Sennhenn S; Färbom L
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1988 Aug; 43(8):874-9. PubMed ID: 3255586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periodontal implications of Class II restorations. Clinical and SEM evaluation.
    Raju PV; Varma BR; Bhat KM
    Indian J Dent Res; 1996; 7(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 9495121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical evaluation of amalgam restorations].
    Santos JF
    Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1981; 35(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 6947340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of periodontal disease in relation to approximating tooth surface to filled surface of Class II silver amalgam restorations.
    Srivastava RP
    Uttar Pradesh State Dent J; 1980 Jan; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6934639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of techniques for the evaluation of marginal adaptation of amalgam restorations.
    Mjör IA; Ryge G
    Int Dent J; 1981 Mar; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7009431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A radiographic method of estimating surface area of amalgam restorations.
    Sammut E; Deery C; Nugent Z; Ibbetson R
    J Dent; 2006 Nov; 34(10):811-6. PubMed ID: 16687199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study of marginal microinfiltration in Class II amalgam restorations with pins, employing 131INa and rhodamine-B].
    Achutti MA; Galan Júnior J; Monelli J
    Ars Curandi Odontol; 1977 Jul; 4(4):36-42. PubMed ID: 293155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of amalgam restorations in deciduous teeth].
    Papagiannoulis L; Patelarou N; Vougiouklakis G
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1985; 39(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 3939458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.