BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38562949)

  • 21. Transvaginal Hybrid-NOTES procedures-do they have a negative impact on pregnancy and delivery?
    Thomaidis P; Weltermann NJ; Seefeldt CS; Richards DC; Sauerwald A; Heiss MM; Bulian DR
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 Sep; 406(6):2045-2052. PubMed ID: 33788009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Middle Eastern women's attitudes and expectations towards vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES): a survey-based observational study.
    Behnia-Willison F; Nguyen T; Rezaeimotlagh A; Baekelandt J; Hewett PJ
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):6865-6872. PubMed ID: 33398552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Which Cholecystectomy Technique Would Surgeons Prefer on Themselves?
    Lima DL; Lima RNCL; Dos Santos DC; Shadduck PP; Carvalho GL; Malcher F
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2020 Dec; 30(6):495-499. PubMed ID: 32675755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: Long-Term Experience with Hybrid Transvaginal Cholecystectomies.
    Rössler F; Keerl A; Bieri U; Slieker J; Nocito A
    Surg Innov; 2020 Dec; 27(6):594-601. PubMed ID: 32538319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Scoring and Interpretation of the FSFI: What can be Learned From 20 Years of use?
    Meston CM; Freihart BK; Handy AB; Kilimnik CD; Rosen RC
    J Sex Med; 2020 Jan; 17(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 31735616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Major Clinical Outcomes Between Transvaginal NOTES and Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Yang E; Nie D; Li Z
    J Surg Res; 2019 Dec; 244():278-290. PubMed ID: 31302326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does obesity influence the results in Transvaginal Hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy?
    Bulian DR; Knuth J; Thomaidis P; Rieger A; Seefeldt CS; Lange J; Meyer J; Stroehlein MA; Heiss MM
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4632-4638. PubMed ID: 29770882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The NOVEL trial: natural orifice versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a prospective, randomized evaluation.
    Schwaitzberg SD; Roberts K; Romanelli JR; Desilets DJ; Earle D; Horgan S; Swanstrom L; Hungness E; Soper N; Kochman ML;
    Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2505-2516. PubMed ID: 29218667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: results of a prospective comparative single-center study.
    Benhidjeb T; Kosmas IP; Hachem F; Mynbaev O; Stark M; Benhidjeb I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Feb; 87(2):509-516. PubMed ID: 28993135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (hybrid) cholecystectomy: The Dhillon technique.
    Dhillon KS; Awasthi D; Dhillon AS
    J Minim Access Surg; 2017; 13(3):176-181. PubMed ID: 28607283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Less pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center pooled analysis.
    Borchert DH; Federlein M; Rückbeil O; Schöpe J
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jun; 31(6):2573-2576. PubMed ID: 27677868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single-Incision and Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Switzerland.
    Steinemann DC; Zerz A; Adamina M; Brunner W; Keerl A; Nocito A; Scheiwiller A; Spalinger R; Vorburger SA; Lamm SH
    World J Surg; 2017 Feb; 41(2):449-456. PubMed ID: 27671014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Safety Outcomes of NOTES Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Peng C; Ling Y; Ma C; Ma X; Fan W; Niu W; Niu J
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Oct; 26(5):347-353. PubMed ID: 27557339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature.
    Gaillard M; Tranchart H; Lainas P; Dagher I
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Oct; 7(10):243-8. PubMed ID: 26523212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy.
    Bulian DR; Knuth J; Lehmann KS; Sauerwald A; Heiss MM
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(38):10915-25. PubMed ID: 26478683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease: A meta-analysis.
    Xu B; Xu B; Zheng WY; Ge HY; Wang LW; Song ZS; He B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5393-406. PubMed ID: 25954114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comprehensive complication index for NOTES procedures: results from a randomized controlled trial and comparison to published NOTES complication data.
    Borchert DH; Federlein M; Müller VA; Wagenpfeil S; Eisele RM
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Oct; 29(10):2928-33. PubMed ID: 25539692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Safety of transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sodergren MH; Markar S; Pucher PH; Badran IA; Jiao LR; Darzi A
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2077-90. PubMed ID: 25424364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transvaginal cholecystectomy learning curve.
    Wood SG; Dai F; Dabu-Bondoc S; Mikhael H; Vadivelu N; Duffy A; Roberts KE
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Jul; 29(7):1837-41. PubMed ID: 25294548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Consumer demand for surgical innovation: a systematic review of public perception of NOTES.
    Pucher PH; Sodergren MH; Lord AC; Teare J; Yang GZ; Darzi A
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):774-80. PubMed ID: 25159629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.