These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38564121)

  • 21. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of palatal bone height for insertion of orthodontic implants - a retrospective CBCT study.
    Chhatwani S; Rose-Zierau V; Haddad B; Almuzian M; Kirschneck C; Danesh G
    Head Face Med; 2019 Apr; 15(1):9. PubMed ID: 30935392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of palatal bone depth, cortical bone, and mucosa thickness for optimal orthodontic miniscrew placement performed according to the third palatal ruga clinical reference.
    Nucera R; Costa S; Bellocchio AM; Barbera S; Drago S; Silvestrini A; Migliorati M
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Sep; 44(5):530-536. PubMed ID: 35201320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age-related changes in maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness in relation to temporary anchorage device placement.
    Sathapana S; Forrest A; Monsour P; Naser-ud-Din S
    Aust Dent J; 2013 Mar; 58(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 23441794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retrospective cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporary anchorage devices.
    Kau CH; English JD; Muller-Delgardo MG; Hamid H; Ellis RK; Winklemann S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):166.e1-5; discussion 166-7. PubMed ID: 20152667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
    Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anatomical consideration for optimal position of orthodontic miniscrews in the maxilla: a CBCT appraisal.
    Al Amri MS; Sabban HM; Alsaggaf DH; Alsulaimani FF; Al-Turki GA; Al-Zahrani MS; Zawawi KH
    Ann Saudi Med; 2020; 40(4):330-337. PubMed ID: 32757983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness for Insertion of Orthodontic Mini-Implants in Adults and Adolescents.
    Wang M; Sun Y; Yu Y; Ding X
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 28(6):1468-1471. PubMed ID: 28841595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of available sites for palatal orthodontic mini-implants through cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lyu X; Guo J; Chen L; Gao Y; Liu L; Pu L; Lai W; Long H
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jul; 90(4):516-523. PubMed ID: 33378492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fractal analysis of the mandible cortical bone: correlation among fractal dimension values obtained by two processing methods from periapical radiograph and micro-computed tomography with cone-beam computed tomography.
    de Oliveira Loures A; de Abreu M; Devito KL; Grisolia-Seifert EF; Jähn-Rickert K; Rabelo GD
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2023 Nov; 62(4):511-518. PubMed ID: 37792108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sex-, growth pattern-, and growth status-related variability in maxillary and mandibular buccal cortical thickness and density.
    Schneider S; Gandhi V; Upadhyay M; Allareddy V; Tadinada A; Yadav S
    Korean J Orthod; 2020 Mar; 50(2):108-119. PubMed ID: 32257936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Palatal bone thickness measured by palatal index method using cone-beam computed tomography in nonorthodontic patients for placement of mini-implants.
    Manjula WS; Murali RV; Kumar SK; Tajir F; Mahalakshmi K
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2015 Apr; 7(Suppl 1):S107-10. PubMed ID: 26015685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in orthodontics: review of the factors that influence the clinical success rate of the mini-implants.
    Leo M; Cerroni L; Pasquantonio G; Condò SG; Condò R
    Clin Ter; 2016; 167(3):e70-7. PubMed ID: 27424513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical study of temporary anchorage devices for orthodontic treatment--stability of micro/mini-screws and mini-plates: experience with 455 cases.
    Takaki T; Tamura N; Yamamoto M; Takano N; Shibahara T; Yasumura T; Nishii Y; Sueishi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2010; 51(3):151-63. PubMed ID: 20877162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs): What to know and how to do?
    Ahn HW; Kang YG; Jeong HJ; Park YG
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():66-74. PubMed ID: 33278057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the soft tissue thickness and greater palatine foramen location in the palate.
    Yilmaz HG; Boke F; Ayali A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 25817728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of in vivo failure of precipitation-coated hydroxyapatite temporary anchorage devices with that of uncoated temporary anchorage devices over 18 months.
    Durrani OK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Apr; 163(4):520-525. PubMed ID: 36503860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Applied anatomic site study of palatal anchorage implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Lai RF; Zou H; Kong WD; Lin W
    Int J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 2(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 20737936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Palatal bone thickness and associated factors in adult miniscrew placements: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Poon YC; Chang HP; Tseng YC; Chou ST; Cheng JH; Liu PH; Pan CY
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 May; 31(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 25910562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Microstructure around Impacted Maxillary Canines Using Fractal Analysis in Dravidian Population: A Retrospective CBCT Study.
    Arvind TRP; Jain RK; Nagi R; Tiwari A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):593-600. PubMed ID: 36259297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.