BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38564215)

  • 1. Quality of Large Language Model Responses to Radiation Oncology Patient Care Questions.
    Yalamanchili A; Sengupta B; Song J; Lim S; Thomas TO; Mittal BB; Abazeed ME; Teo PT
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Apr; 7(4):e244630. PubMed ID: 38564215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Ophthalmologist and Large Language Model Chatbot Responses to Online Patient Eye Care Questions.
    Bernstein IA; Zhang YV; Govil D; Majid I; Chang RT; Sun Y; Shue A; Chou JC; Schehlein E; Christopher KL; Groth SL; Ludwig C; Wang SY
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Aug; 6(8):e2330320. PubMed ID: 37606922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Artificial Intelligence Pass the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Examination? Orthopaedic Residents Versus ChatGPT.
    Lum ZC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Aug; 481(8):1623-1630. PubMed ID: 37220190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
    He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e56655. PubMed ID: 38630520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Study of Responses to Retina Questions from Either Experts, Expert-Edited Large Language Models, or Expert-Edited Large Language Models Alone.
    Tailor PD; Dalvin LA; Chen JJ; Iezzi R; Olsen TW; Scruggs BA; Barkmeier AJ; Bakri SJ; Ryan EH; Tang PH; Parke DW; Belin PJ; Sridhar J; Xu D; Kuriyan AE; Yonekawa Y; Starr MR
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2024; 4(4):100485. PubMed ID: 38660460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of Large Language Models on Medical Oncology Examination Questions.
    Longwell JB; Hirsch I; Binder F; Gonzalez Conchas GA; Mau D; Jang R; Krishnan RG; Grant RC
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2417641. PubMed ID: 38888919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
    He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
    ArXiv; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38529075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating ChatGPT to test its robustness as an interactive information database of radiation oncology and to assess its responses to common queries from radiotherapy patients: A single institution investigation.
    Pandey VK; Munshi A; Mohanti BK; Bansal K; Rastogi K
    Cancer Radiother; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38866652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring Capabilities of Large Language Models such as ChatGPT in Radiation Oncology.
    Dennstädt F; Hastings J; Putora PM; Vu E; Fischer GF; Süveg K; Glatzer M; Riggenbach E; Hà HL; Cihoric N
    Adv Radiat Oncol; 2024 Mar; 9(3):101400. PubMed ID: 38304112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of Large Language Models on a Neurology Board-Style Examination.
    Schubert MC; Wick W; Venkataramani V
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Dec; 6(12):e2346721. PubMed ID: 38060223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From jargon to clarity: Improving the readability of foot and ankle radiology reports with an artificial intelligence large language model.
    Butler JJ; Harrington MC; Tong Y; Rosenbaum AJ; Samsonov AP; Walls RJ; Kennedy JG
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2024 Jun; 30(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 38336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doctor Versus Artificial Intelligence: Patient and Physician Evaluation of Large Language Model Responses to Rheumatology Patient Questions in a Cross-Sectional Study.
    Ye C; Zweck E; Ma Z; Smith J; Katz S
    Arthritis Rheumatol; 2024 Mar; 76(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 37902018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Harnessing artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in generating clinician-level bariatric surgery recommendations.
    Lee Y; Shin T; Tessier L; Javidan A; Jung J; Hong D; Strong AT; McKechnie T; Malone S; Jin D; Kroh M; Dang JT;
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2024 Jul; 20(7):603-608. PubMed ID: 38644078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dr. Google vs. Dr. ChatGPT: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology by Comparing the Accuracy, Safety, and Readability of Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions Regarding Cataracts and Cataract Surgery.
    Cohen SA; Brant A; Fisher AC; Pershing S; Do D; Pan C
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38516983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI.
    Mediboina A; Badam RK; Chodavarapu S
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e51544. PubMed ID: 38318564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large Language Model-Based Chatbot vs Surgeon-Generated Informed Consent Documentation for Common Procedures.
    Decker H; Trang K; Ramirez J; Colley A; Pierce L; Coleman M; Bongiovanni T; Melton GB; Wick E
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Oct; 6(10):e2336997. PubMed ID: 37812419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Emerging Role of AI in Patient Education: A Comparative Analysis of LLM Accuracy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Rahimli Ocakoglu S; Coskun B
    Med Princ Pract; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ChatGPT Versus Consultants: Blinded Evaluation on Answering Otorhinolaryngology Case-Based Questions.
    Buhr CR; Smith H; Huppertz T; Bahr-Hamm K; Matthias C; Blaikie A; Kelsey T; Kuhn S; Eckrich J
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Dec; 9():e49183. PubMed ID: 38051578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Application of Large Language Models in Generating Dermatologic Patient Education Materials According to Reading Level: Qualitative Study.
    Lambert R; Choo ZY; Gradwohl K; Schroedl L; Ruiz De Luzuriaga A
    JMIR Dermatol; 2024 May; 7():e55898. PubMed ID: 38754096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From technical to understandable: Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models improve the readability of knee radiology reports.
    Butler JJ; Puleo J; Harrington MC; Dahmen J; Rosenbaum AJ; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; Kennedy JG
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2024 May; 32(5):1077-1086. PubMed ID: 38488217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.