119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38565129)
21. Transmission of calibration errors (input) by generalized transfer functions to the aortic pressures (output) at different hemodynamic states.
Papaioannou TG; Lekakis JP; Karatzis EN; Papamichael CM; Stamatelopoulos KS; Protogerou AD; Mavrikakis M; Stefanadis C
Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 110(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16229910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Central Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Sphygmocor Xcel Cuff Device.
Schultz MG; Picone DS; Armstrong MK; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Sharman JE
Hypertension; 2020 Jul; 76(1):244-250. PubMed ID: 32475318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy Difference of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements by Sex and Height.
Abbaoui Y; Fortier C; Desbiens LC; Kowalski C; Lamarche F; Nadeau-Fredette AC; Madore F; Agharazii M; Goupil R
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jun; 5(6):e2215513. PubMed ID: 35671057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of invasive and brachial cuff-based noninvasive measurements for the assessment of blood pressure amplification.
Nakagomi A; Okada S; Shoji T; Kobayashi Y
Hypertens Res; 2017 Mar; 40(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27761001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inter-arm difference of systolic blood pressure measured by automated double-cuff device is associated with arterial stiffness in patients with hypertension.
Iida M; Ishiguro Y; Ueda N; Honjo H
Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 31714348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does the position or contact pressure of the stethoscope make any difference to clinical blood pressure measurements: an observational study.
Pan F; Zheng D; He P; Murray A
Medicine (Baltimore); 2014 Dec; 93(29):e301. PubMed ID: 25546675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison between cuff-based and invasive systolic blood pressure amplification.
Bui TV; Picone DS; Schultz MG; Armstrong MK; Peng X; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Adams H; Hughes AD; Sharman JE
J Hypertens; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2037-2044. PubMed ID: 36052526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method.
Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
Am J Hypertens; 2012 Nov; 25(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 22874891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the Vicorder, a novel cuff-based device for the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure.
Pucci G; Cheriyan J; Hubsch A; Hickson SS; Gajendragadkar PR; Watson T; O'Sullivan M; Woodcock-Smith J; Schillaci G; Wilkinson IB; McEniery CM
J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23079681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative Comparison of Korotkoff Sound Waveform Characteristics: Effects of Static Cuff Pressures and Stethoscope Positions.
Pan F; Chen F; Liu C; Yang Z; Liu Z; Zheng D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Nov; 46(11):1736-1744. PubMed ID: 29959551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improving the quality and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurement by visual inspection and automated signal processing of the Korotkoff sounds.
Celler BG; Le P; Basilakis J; Ambikairajah E
Physiol Meas; 2017 Jun; 38(6):1006-1022. PubMed ID: 28471753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cuff width alters the amplitude envelope of wrist cuff pressure pulse waveforms.
Jilek J; Stork M
Physiol Meas; 2010 Jul; 31(7):N43-9. PubMed ID: 20505218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Central blood pressure and pulse wave velocity in young and middle-aged Japanese adults with isolated systolic hypertension.
Nakagomi A; Imazeki F; Nishimura M; Sawabe Y; Matsushita K; Murata A; Watase M; Okada S; Kobayashi Y
Hypertens Res; 2020 Mar; 43(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 31784679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A new photo-oscillometric method employing the delta-algorithm for accurate blood pressure measurement.
Tochikubo O; Kawano Y; Miyajima E; Ishii M
J Hypertens; 1997 Feb; 15(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 9469790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Advanced Volume-Compensation Method for Indirect Finger Arterial Pressure Determination: Comparison with Brachial Sphygmomanometry.
Matsumura K; Yamakoshi T; Rolfe P; Yamakoshi KI
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 May; 64(5):1131-1137. PubMed ID: 27429430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Effect of Three Different Cuff/Arm Circumference Ratios Ranging over 80% on Cuff Blood Pressure Measurements.
Peng P; Xu J; Hu K; Su H
Int Heart J; 2023; 64(4):693-699. PubMed ID: 37518351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of the AM-5600 blood pressure monitor: comparison with ambulatory intra-arterial pressure.
Omboni S; Parati G; Groppelli A; Ulian L; Mancia G
J Appl Physiol (1985); 1997 Feb; 82(2):698-703. PubMed ID: 9049755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Non-invasive determination of instantaneous brachial blood flow using the oscillometric method.
Liu SH; Wang JJ; Cheng DC
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Aug; 54(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19807282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of a brachial cuff and suprasystolic waveform algorithm method to noninvasively derive central blood pressure.
Costello BT; Schultz MG; Black JA; Sharman JE
Am J Hypertens; 2015 Apr; 28(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 25194156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
