These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38565271)
21. Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women's social egg freezing experiences. De Proost M; Coene G; Nekkebroeck J; Provoost V J Med Ethics; 2022 Jun; 48(6):386-390. PubMed ID: 33846274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Women's perspectives on health facility and system levels factors influencing mode of delivery in Tehran: a qualitative study. Shirzad M; Shakibazadeh E; Betran AP; Bohren MA; Abedini M Reprod Health; 2019 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 30736792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment. Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):714-7. PubMed ID: 8401094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Warnock report and partial ectogestation: retracing the past to step into the future. Adkins V Med Law Rev; 2023 Aug; 31(3):424-440. PubMed ID: 37146229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Women's preferences and knowledge about the legal competences of midwives in Brussels, Belgium. A descriptive observational study. Vermeulen J; Swinnen E; D'haenens F; Buyl R; Beeckman K Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():177-86. PubMed ID: 27450589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Equal is as equal does: challenging Vatican views on women. Women-Church Convergence Plan Parent Chall; 1995; (2):10-3. PubMed ID: 12346469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors influencing women's preferences for subsequent management in the event of incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage. Hentzen JEKR; Verschoor MA; Lemmers M; Ankum WM; Mol BWJ; van Wely M Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1674-1683. PubMed ID: 28575402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reproductive technologies are not the cure for social problems. Campo-Engelstein L J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):85-86. PubMed ID: 31974292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Women's perspectives on reproductive health and rights. Overview. Humble M Plan Parent Chall; 1995; (2):26-31. PubMed ID: 12346476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Social egg freezing: the prospect of reproductive 'immortality' or a dangerous delusion? Lockwood GM Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Sep; 23(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 21775211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ethics and reproductive health: a principled approach. Macklin R World Health Stat Q; 1996; 49(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 9050194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Unveiling the controversy on egg freezing in The Netherlands: A Q-methodology study on women's viewpoints. Kostenzer J; Bos AME; Bont A; Exel JV Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2021 Mar; 12():32-43. PubMed ID: 33319082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Women's health from a woman's point of view: a review of the literature. Lempert LB Health Care Women Int; 1986; 7(3):255-75. PubMed ID: 3522518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Rights of life. Sexuality and reproduction. Shallat L Womens Health J; 1993; (3):31-7. PubMed ID: 12179734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproductive technology and the life course: current debates and research in social egg freezing. Baldwin K; Culley L; Hudson N; Mitchell H Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Sep; 17(3):170-9. PubMed ID: 25093571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy. Stephenson PA; Wagner MG J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gestating times: women's accounts of the temporalities of pregnancies that end in abortion in England. Beynon-Jones SM Sociol Health Illn; 2017 Jul; 39(6):832-846. PubMed ID: 27910107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Abortion & 'artificial wombs': would 'artificial womb' technology legally empower non-gestating genetic progenitors to participate in decisions about Romanis EC J Law Biosci; 2021; 8(1):lsab011. PubMed ID: 34055368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Male appropriation and medicalization of childbirth: an historical analysis. Cahill HA J Adv Nurs; 2001 Feb; 33(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 11251720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]