143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38566169)
1. Clinical efficacy of intraoral ultrasonography versus transgingival probing for measurement of gingival thickness in different gingival biotypes: a clinical trial.
Alizad-Rahvar M; Safi Y; Kadkhodazadeh M; Ghomashi MP
Head Face Med; 2024 Apr; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 38566169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Gingival Thickness Using CBCT Compared to Transgingival Probing and Its Correlation with Labial Bone Defects: A Cross-Sectional Study.
El Khalifa M; Abu El Sadat SM; Gaweesh YS; Gaweesh YY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):464-472. PubMed ID: 35727236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Das G; Ahmed AR; Suleman G; Lal A; Rana MH; Ahmed N; Arora S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Sep; 58(9):. PubMed ID: 36143989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of gingival thickness by CBCT versus transgingival probing and estimation of cut-off values for gingival phenotype - A cross-sectional study in adults.
Gupta S; Mendiratta AK; Shaikh MA; Dora H; Shamsuddin S; Maqhbool SB
Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(3):100892. PubMed ID: 38936246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and computed tomographic evaluations of periodontal phenotypes in a Chinese population: a cross-sectional study.
Zhang Y; Chen F; Kang N; Duan J; Xue F; Cai Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3569-3577. PubMed ID: 36964225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of high-resolution ultrasound (US) for gingival soft tissue thickness mesurement in edentulous patients prior to implant placement.
Sönmez G; Kamburoğlu K; Gülşahı A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200309. PubMed ID: 33201732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transgingival probing: a clinical gold standard for assessing gingival thickness.
Kloukos D; Koukos G; Gkantidis N; Sculean A; Katsaros C; Stavropoulos A
Quintessence Int; 2021; 52(5):394-401. PubMed ID: 33533238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of the PIROP ultrasonic biometer for gingival thickness measurements.
Gánti B; Bednarz W; Kőműves K; Vág J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 May; 31(3):263-267. PubMed ID: 30520211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of gingival thickness using digital file superimposition versus direct clinical measurements.
Couso-Queiruga E; Tattan M; Ahmad U; Barwacz C; Gonzalez-Martin O; Avila-Ortiz G
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):2353-2361. PubMed ID: 32865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Gingival Thickness Measurement by Clinical Evaluation and Intraoral Ultrasonography.
Soltani P; Yaghini J; Rafiei K; Mehdizadeh M; Armogida NG; Esposito L; Spagnuolo G
J Clin Med; 2023 Jun; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 37445430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative assesment of gingival thickness using transgingival probing and ultrasonographic method.
Savitha B; Vandana KL
Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(4):135-9. PubMed ID: 16761705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of gingival thickness in the maxillary anterior region using different techniques.
Nisanci Yilmaz MN; Koseoglu Secgin C; Ozemre MO; İnonu E; Aslan S; Bulut S
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Nov; 26(11):6531-6538. PubMed ID: 35796801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of gingival thickness in multi-ethnic subjects with different gingival pigmentation levels.
Nik-Azis NM; Razali M; Goh V; Ahmad Shuhaimi NN; Mohd Nazrin NAS
J Clin Periodontol; 2023 Jan; 50(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 36089895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gingival profiles in a select Asian cohort: A pilot study.
Lee WZ; Ong MMA; Yeo AB
J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Feb; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 28393469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revisiting the measurement of keratinized gingiva: a cross-sectional study comparing an intraoral scanner with clinical parameters.
Nalbantoğlu AM; Yanık D
J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2023 Oct; 53(5):362-375. PubMed ID: 37524382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methods to assess tooth gingival thickness and diagnose gingival phenotypes: A systematic review.
Wang J; Cha S; Zhao Q; Bai D
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):620-632. PubMed ID: 35297167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlations of gingival biotype with clinical crown and periodontal parameters in maxillary and mandibular jaws.
Gadge NP; Chawla R; Ronad S; Bhole SV; Kumar P; Kattimani PT
Clin Adv Periodontics; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38884937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Periodontal soft tissue increase induced by periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics surgery.
Han Y; Miao L; Liu J; Xu X; Yue Z; Xu M; Shu C; Xu L; Hou J
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):506. PubMed ID: 36384587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva.
De Rouck T; Eghbali R; Collys K; De Bruyn H; Cosyn J
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 19419444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Digital evaluation of supracrestal gingival thickness induced by periodontal regenerative and corticotomy surgery in patients with skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion].
Han Y; Miao LL; Jing WD; Li XT; Zhao YJ; Xu L; Hou JX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 32074666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
