143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38566169)
21. Measurement of gingival thickness using digital vernier caliper and ultrasonographic method: a comparative study.
Sharma S; Thakur SL; Joshi SK; Kulkarni SS
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 May; 5(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 23355379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Relationships among the periodontal biotype characteristics in the maxillary anterior].
Yuan J; Guo QQ; Li Q; Sui YJ; Jiang BQ
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 38(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 32865358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of gingival biotype and facial hard/soft tissue dimensions in the maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography.
Amid R; Mirakhori M; Safi Y; Kadkhodazadeh M; Namdari M
Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Jul; 79():1-6. PubMed ID: 28279824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A novel soft tissue thickness measuring method using cone beam computed tomography.
Gürlek Ö; Sönmez Ş; Güneri P; Nizam N
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Nov; 30(6):516-522. PubMed ID: 30444040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Gingival thickness assessment at the mandibular incisors with four methods: A cross-sectional study.
Kloukos D; Koukos G; Doulis I; Sculean A; Stavropoulos A; Katsaros C
J Periodontol; 2018 Nov; 89(11):1300-1309. PubMed ID: 30043972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in determining gingival thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Freitas Silva BS; Silva JK; Silva LR; de Lima KL; Mezaiko E; Roriz VM; Evangelista K; Yamamoto-Silva FP
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 May; 27(5):1801-1814. PubMed ID: 36757462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative
Sala L; Alonso-Pérez R; Agustin-Panadero R; Ferreiroa A; Carrillo-de-Albornoz A
J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Sep; 10(9):e858-e863. PubMed ID: 30386517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods.
Alves PHM; Alves TCLP; Pegoraro TA; Costa YM; Bonfante EA; de Almeida ALPF
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):280-284. PubMed ID: 29350855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of the correlation between supracrestal gingival tissue dimensions and other periodontal phenotypes components via the digital registration method: a cross‑sectional study in a Chinese population.
Lin K; Wang S; Xu X; Yu L; Pan R; Zheng M; Yang J; Guo J
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):408. PubMed ID: 38561756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in the gingival thickness and keratinized gingival width of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment.
Alkan Ö; Kaya Y; Tunca M; Keskin S
Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):459-467. PubMed ID: 33625489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Periodontal Biotype: Gingival Thickness as It Relates to Probe Visibility and Buccal Plate Thickness.
Frost NA; Mealey BL; Jones AA; Huynh-Ba G
J Periodontol; 2015 Oct; 86(10):1141-9. PubMed ID: 26110452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cone-beam computed tomography as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness and distance between gingival margin and bone crest.
Borges GJ; Ruiz LF; de Alencar AH; Porto OC; Estrela C
ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():142108. PubMed ID: 25918737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of Periodontal Biotype in a Young Chinese Population using Different Measurement Methods.
Shao Y; Yin L; Gu J; Wang D; Lu W; Sun Y
Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11212. PubMed ID: 30046153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of gingival thickness using an ultrasonic dental system prototype: A comparison to traditional methods.
Slak B; Daabous A; Bednarz W; Strumban E; Maev RG
Ann Anat; 2015 May; 199():98-103. PubMed ID: 24718296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Difference in Buccal Gingival Thickness between the Mandible and Maxilla in the Aesthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Schwarz L; Andrukhov O; Rausch MA; Rausch-Fan X; Jonke E
J Clin Med; 2024 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 38542013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Gingival Biotype Assessment in a Healthy Periodontium: Transgingival Probing Method.
Manjunath RG; Rana A; Sarkar A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):ZC66-9. PubMed ID: 26155566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of an innovative radiographic technique--parallel profile radiography--to determine the dimensions of dentogingival unit.
Galgali SR; Gontiya G
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 21891892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gingival thickness and gingival width in children: a cross-sectional study utilizing ultrasonography.
Lambrou P; Kalfas S; Arhakis A
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2024 Apr; 25(2):217-225. PubMed ID: 38485836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A novel approach for gingiva thickness measurements around lower anterior teeth by means of dental magnetic resonance imaging.
Schwarz L; Unger E; Gahleitner A; Rausch-Fan X; Jonke E
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 28(1):18. PubMed ID: 38135801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Identification of thin and thick gingival phenotypes by two transparency methods: A diagnostic accuracy study.
da Costa FA; Perussolo J; Dias DR; Araújo MG
J Periodontol; 2023 May; 94(5):673-682. PubMed ID: 36504403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
