These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38566302)

  • 1. Patient-reported outcome differences for navigated and robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty frequently do not achieve clinically important differences: a systematic review.
    Lawrence KW; Rajahraman V; Meftah M; Rozell JC; Schwarzkopf R; Arshi A
    Hip Int; 2024 Sep; 34(5):578-587. PubMed ID: 38566302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Navigated and Robot-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do Outcome Differences Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference?
    Arshi A; Sekimura T; Kelley BV; Zeegen EN; Lonner JH; Stavrakis AI
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1562-1569. PubMed ID: 35367335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.
    Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Christopher ZK; Gerhart CRB; Clarke HD; Spangehl MJ; Bingham JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 481(4):702-714. PubMed ID: 36398323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Matched Comparison of the Rates of Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Conversion and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Humphrey TJ; Salimy MS; Duvvuri P; Melnic CM; Bedair HS; Alpaugh K
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1767-1772. PubMed ID: 36931363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a fluoroscopy-based robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system produced greater improvements in patient-reported outcomes at one year compared to manual, fluoroscopic-assisted technique.
    Buchan GBJ; Ong CB; Hecht Ii CJ; DeCook CA; Spencer-Gardner LS; Kamath AF
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Apr; 144(4):1843-1850. PubMed ID: 38400899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.
    Rojanasopondist P; Galea VP; Connelly JW; Matuszak SJ; Rolfson O; Bragdon CR; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 31136425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does acetabular robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty with femoral navigation improve clinical outcomes at 1-year post-operative? A case-matched propensity score study comparing 98 robotic-assisted versus 98 manual implantation hip arthroplasties.
    Coulomb R; Cascales V; Haignere V; Bauzou F; Kouyoumdjian P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Feb; 109(1):103477. PubMed ID: 36375721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Robotic-Arm Assisted Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study With Minimum 3 Years' Follow-Up.
    Fontalis A; Kayani B; Haddad IC; Donovan C; Tahmassebi J; Haddad FS
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7 Suppl 2):S324-S329. PubMed ID: 37105324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.
    Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Gerhart CRB; Christopher ZK; Spangehl MJ; Clarke HD; Bingham JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jan; 481(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 36200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Corfield S; Harries D; Harris IA; Vince KG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jan; 482(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 37339166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted or Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up: A Systematic Review.
    Sweet MC; Borrelli GJ; Manawar SS; Miladore N
    JBJS Rev; 2021 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 34130305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.
    Kuo AC; Giori NJ; Bowe TR; Manfredi L; Lalani NF; Nordin DA; Harris AHS
    JAMA Surg; 2020 May; 155(5):404-411. PubMed ID: 32211842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotics Versus Navigation Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does the Use of Technology Yield Superior Outcomes?
    Singh V; Realyvasquez J; Simcox T; Rozell JC; Schwarzkopf R; Davidovitch RI
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Aug; 36(8):2801-2807. PubMed ID: 33773864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?
    Lyman S; Lee YY; McLawhorn AS; Islam W; MacLean CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2432-2441. PubMed ID: 30179951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement.
    Trotzky Z; Muffly B; Cao N; Sink E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Sep; 482(9):1671-1682. PubMed ID: 38513108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Challenging the Status Quo: Debunking the Necessity of 5-Year to 10-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.
    Pasqualini I; Rullán PJ; Huffman N; Klika AK; Shen J; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Hampp E; Piuzzi NS
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S143-S150. PubMed ID: 38122838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Surgical Time, Short-term Adverse Events, and Implant Placement Accuracy Between Manual, Robotic-assisted, and Computer-navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kunze KN; Bovonratwet P; Polce EM; Paul K; Sculco PK
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2022 Apr; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 35472191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there increased value in robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty? : a nationwide outcomes, trends, and projections analysis of 4,699,894 cases.
    Emara AK; Zhou G; Klika AK; Koroukian SM; Schiltz NK; Higuera-Rueda CA; Molloy RM; Piuzzi NS
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Sep; 103-B(9):1488-1496. PubMed ID: 34465149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precise acetabular positioning, discrepancy in leg length, and hip offset using a new seven-axis robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty system requires no learning curve: a retrospective study.
    Tian R; Duan X; Kong N; Wang K; Yang P
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 18(1):236. PubMed ID: 36964615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative outcomes and trends in computer-navigated and robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.
    Piple AS; Wang JC; Hill W; Chen MS; Gettleman BS; Liu KC; Heckmann ND; Christ AB
    Hip Int; 2024 Sep; 34(5):569-577. PubMed ID: 39114946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.