129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38566634)
1. Office Rigid Laryngoscopy as a Predictor for Glottic Exposure in Microlaryngoscopy.
Manjunath MK; Sachidananda R; Jyothi Swarup R; Sreenivasa Murthy TM
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Apr; 76(2):1765-1769. PubMed ID: 38566634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure for microlaryngoscopy: the Laryngoscore.
Piazza C; Mangili S; Bon FD; Paderno A; Grazioli P; Barbieri D; Perotti P; Garofolo S; Nicolai P; Peretti G
Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124(11):2561-7. PubMed ID: 24964904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evaluation of benign glottic lesions: rigid telescopic stroboscopy versus suspension microlaryngoscopy.
Dailey SH; Spanou K; Zeitels SM
J Voice; 2007 Jan; 21(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 16442777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examination of the hypopharynx predicts ease of laryngoscopic visualization and subsequent intubation: a prospective study of 665 patients.
Cohen SM; Laurito CE; Segil LJ
J Clin Anesth; 1992; 4(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 1419012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences between flexible and rigid endoscopy in assessing the posterior glottic chink.
Chandran S; Hanna J; Lurie D; Sataloff RT
J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 21051195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in Glottal Closure and Visibility of the Anterior Commissure during Rigid-90°, Rigid-70°, and Flexible Laryngostroboscopy.
Paulus R; Leonhard M; Ho GY; Kurz A; Schneider-Stickler B
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2023; 75(5):324-333. PubMed ID: 37004509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Videostroboscopy and Direct Microlaryngoscopy: An Argument for Flexible Consent and Operative Plan.
Young WG; Shama L; Petty B; Hoffman MR; Dailey SH
J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 29187295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Applying a rigid curved video laryngoscope in laryngeal microsurgery of patients with difficult laryngeal exposure].
Wang G; Bing D; Chen X; Dong P
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 36(6):463-466. PubMed ID: 35822366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of Difficult Laryngeal Exposure During Suspension Microlaryngoscopy.
Joshi AA; Velecharla MS; Patel TS; Shah KD; Bradoo RA
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Mar; 71(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 30906719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Study of Application of Preoperative Clinical Predictors of Difficult Laryngeal Exposure for Microlaryngoscopy: The Laryngoscore in the Indian Population.
Arjun AP; Dutta A
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Dec; 71(4):480-485. PubMed ID: 31750107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Videolaryngostroboscopy versus microlaryngoscopy for the diagnosis of benign vocal cord lesions: a prospective clinical study.
Akbulut S; Altintas H; Oguz H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jan; 272(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 25033931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Grading System for Transnasal Flexible Laryngoscopy.
Tasli H; Karakoc O; Birkent H
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):712-715. PubMed ID: 29730193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Office-based and microlaryngeal applications of a fiber-based thulium laser.
Zeitels SM; Burns JA; Akst LM; Hillman RE; Broadhurst MS; Anderson RR
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2006 Dec; 115(12):891-6. PubMed ID: 17214262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The AESOP robot system for video-assisted rigid endoscopic laryngosurgery.
Alessandrini M; De Padova A; Napolitano B; Camillo A; Bruno E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 265(9):1121-3. PubMed ID: 18536928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Difficult Laryngeal Exposure in Microlaryngoscopy: Can it be Predicted Preoperatively?
Paul RR; Varghese AM; Mathew J; Chandrasekharan R; Amalanathan S; Asif SK; Kurien M
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 68(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 27066414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting laryngeal exposure in microlaryngoscopy: External validation of the laryngoscore.
Tirelli G; Gatto A; Fortunati A; Marzolino R; Giudici F; Boscolo Nata F
Laryngoscope; 2019 Jun; 129(6):1438-1443. PubMed ID: 30511499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Method for Reconstruction of Anterior Commissure Glottal Webs With Endoscopic Fibro-Mucosal Flaps.
Zeitels SM; Hillman RE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2019 Mar; 128(3_suppl):82S-93S. PubMed ID: 30843433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rescue microlaryngoscopy: a protocol for utilization of four techniques in overcoming challenging exposures in microlaryngeal surgery.
Cheng J; Woo P
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):590-5. PubMed ID: 22578436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quantitative study of airway ultrasound in predicting difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective study.
Ning L; Zhu X; Li HC; Zhou SJ; Zhang QW; Zou HY; Mao QX; Yan H
Chin J Traumatol; 2023 Nov; 26(6):351-356. PubMed ID: 37838578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
