These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38567838)

  • 1. Contextual bias in forensic toxicology decisions: A follow-up empirical study from China.
    He N; Hao H
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1400-1406. PubMed ID: 38567838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual bias by Forensic Document Examination trainees: An empirical study from China.
    He N; Hao H
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jul; 64(4):360-366. PubMed ID: 39025561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences.
    Hamnett HJ; Jack RE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):380-389. PubMed ID: 31256809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of contextual information on decision-making in forensic toxicology.
    Hamnett HJ; Dror IE
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2020; 2():339-348. PubMed ID: 33385132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The biasing impact of irrelevant contextual information on forensic odontology radiograph matching decisions.
    Chiam SL; Dror IE; Huber CD; Higgins D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110997. PubMed ID: 34536753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions.
    Dror I; Melinek J; Arden JL; Kukucka J; Hawkins S; Carter J; Atherton DS
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1751-1757. PubMed ID: 33608908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Dror IE; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 24796950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-mortem toxicology in violent fatalities in Cape Town, South Africa: A preliminary investigation.
    Auckloo MBKM; Davies BB
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Apr; 63():18-25. PubMed ID: 30844584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A global survey of the attitudes and perspectives of cognitive bias in forensic anthropology.
    Leung KN; Nakhaeizadeh S; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jul; 64(4):347-359. PubMed ID: 39025560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synovial fluid: an alternative toxicologic specimen?
    Deking J; Hargrove VM; Molina DK
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2014 Jun; 35(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 24781403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
    Cooper GS; Meterko V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():35-46. PubMed ID: 30769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proficiency testing as a basis for estimating uncertainty of measurement: application to forensic alcohol and toxicology quantitations.
    Wallace J
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 May; 55(3):767-73. PubMed ID: 20345793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence.
    Thompson WC; Scurich N
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 30791101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons?
    Osborne NK; Woods S; Kieser J; Zajac R
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 25002044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1740-1757. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias.
    Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework.
    Quigley-McBride A; Dror IE; Roy T; Garrett BL; Kukucka J
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100216. PubMed ID: 35243284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.