These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38568095)

  • 41. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.
    Rafferty EA; Park JM; Philpotts LE; Poplack SP; Sumkin JH; Halpern EF; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 23169790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Slab Thickness: Impact on Reader Performance and Interpretation Time.
    Pujara AC; Joe AI; Patterson SK; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Ma T; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Maturen KE
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):534-542. PubMed ID: 33021891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Improving the Performance of Radiologists Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection Support Software for Mammography: A Multi-Reader Study.
    Lee JH; Kim KH; Lee EH; Ahn JS; Ryu JK; Park YM; Shin GW; Kim YJ; Choi HY
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 May; 23(5):505-516. PubMed ID: 35434976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Improves Radiologist Performance in Skeletal Age Assessment: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Eng DK; Khandwala NB; Long J; Fefferman NR; Lala SV; Strubel NA; Milla SS; Filice RW; Sharp SE; Towbin AJ; Francavilla ML; Kaplan SL; Ecklund K; Prabhu SP; Dillon BJ; Everist BM; Anton CG; Bittman ME; Dennis R; Larson DB; Seekins JM; Silva CT; Zandieh AR; Langlotz CP; Lungren MP; Halabi SS
    Radiology; 2021 Dec; 301(3):692-699. PubMed ID: 34581608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Tan T; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2019 Sep; 111(9):916-922. PubMed ID: 30834436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
    Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Purushothaman H; Strudley C; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. PubMed ID: 25599513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.
    Gur D; Abrams GS; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Perrin RL; Rathfon GY; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Bandos AI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 19620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Use of Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Unnecessary Recalls at Screening Mammography: A Simulation Study.
    Kim YS; Jang MJ; Lee SH; Kim SY; Ha SM; Kwon BR; Moon WK; Chang JM
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 Dec; 23(12):1241-1250. PubMed ID: 36447412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Semiautonomous Deep Learning System to Reduce False Positives in Screening Mammography.
    Pedemonte S; Tsue T; Mombourquette B; Truong Vu YN; Matthews T; Morales Hoil R; Shah M; Ghare N; Zingman-Daniels N; Holley S; Appleton CM; Su J; Wahl RL
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230033. PubMed ID: 38597785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Artificial intelligence (AI) for breast cancer screening: BreastScreen population-based cohort study of cancer detection.
    Marinovich ML; Wylie E; Lotter W; Lund H; Waddell A; Madeley C; Pereira G; Houssami N
    EBioMedicine; 2023 Apr; 90():104498. PubMed ID: 36863255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessment of an AI Aid in Detection of Adult Appendicular Skeletal Fractures by Emergency Physicians and Radiologists: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Diagnostic Study.
    Duron L; Ducarouge A; Gillibert A; Lainé J; Allouche C; Cherel N; Zhang Z; Nitche N; Lacave E; Pourchot A; Felter A; Lassalle L; Regnard NE; Feydy A
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):120-129. PubMed ID: 33944629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?
    Mall S; Noakes J; Kossoff M; Lee W; McKessar M; Goy A; Duncombe J; Roberts M; Giuffre B; Miller A; Bhola N; Kapoor C; Shearman C; DaCosta G; Choi S; Sterba J; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Donohue K; Macdonell-Scott B; Klijnsma F; Suzuki K; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5182-5194. PubMed ID: 29846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of radiologists' experience on breast cancer detection and localization using digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Alakhras MM; Brennan PC; Rickard M; Bourne R; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Feb; 25(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 25192796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound.
    Kwon MR; Youn I; Lee MY; Lee HA
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):480-491. PubMed ID: 37813703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Screening Outcomes of Mammography with AI in Dense Breasts: A Comparative Study with Supplemental Screening US.
    Ha SM; Jang MJ; Youn I; Yoen H; Ji H; Lee SH; Yi A; Chang JM
    Radiology; 2024 Jul; 312(1):e233391. PubMed ID: 39041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessment of Radiologist Performance in Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.
    Sprague BL; Coley RY; Kerlikowske K; Rauscher GH; Henderson LM; Onega T; Lee CI; Herschorn SD; Tosteson ANA; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e201759. PubMed ID: 32227180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Competition, Benchmark, Code, and Data for Using Artificial Intelligence to Detect Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Konz N; Buda M; Gu H; Saha A; Yang J; Chledowski J; Park J; Witowski J; Geras KJ; Shoshan Y; Gilboa-Solomon F; Khapun D; Ratner V; Barkan E; Ozery-Flato M; Martí R; Omigbodun A; Marasinou C; Nakhaei N; Hsu W; Sahu P; Hossain MB; Lee J; Santos C; Przelaskowski A; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Bearce B; Cha K; Farahani K; Petrick N; Hadjiiski L; Drukker K; Armato SG; Mazurowski MA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Feb; 6(2):e230524. PubMed ID: 36821110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis.
    Eom HJ; Cha JH; Choi WJ; Cho SM; Jin K; Kim HH
    Acta Radiol; 2024 Jul; 65(7):708-715. PubMed ID: 38825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.