These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38568356)

  • 21. Improving face identification of mask-wearing individuals.
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Mar; 7(1):27. PubMed ID: 35347475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.
    Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm.
    Davis JP; Maigut AC; Jolliffe D; Gibson SJ; Solomon CJ
    J Vis Exp; 2015 Dec; (106):e53298. PubMed ID: 26779673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.
    Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eyewitness memory in the news can affect the strategic regulation of memory reporting.
    Butt MM; Colloff MF; Magner E; Flowe HD
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):763-774. PubMed ID: 33258419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Memory strength and lineup presentation moderate effects of administrator influence on mistaken identifications.
    Zimmerman DM; Chorn JA; Rhead LM; Evelo AJ; Kovera MB
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):460-473. PubMed ID: 29265857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification.
    Akan M; Robinson MM; Mickes L; Wixted JT; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):369-392. PubMed ID: 33271047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance.
    Smith AM; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 32375014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups.
    Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling face similarity in police lineups.
    Shen KJ; Colloff MF; Vul E; Wilson BM; Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):432-461. PubMed ID: 36548056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reaction time-based Concealed Information Test in eyewitness identification is moderated by picture similarity but not eyewitness cooperation.
    Georgiadou K; Chronos A; Verschuere B; Sauerland M
    Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2278-2288. PubMed ID: 30635707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of estimator variables in eyewitness identification.
    Semmler C; Dunn J; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):400-415. PubMed ID: 29389161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L; Fisher RP
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 May; 13(3):324-335. PubMed ID: 29716454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PC_Eyewitness: a computerized framework for the administration and practical application of research in eyewitness psychology.
    MacLin OH; Meissner CA; Zimmerman LA
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 May; 37(2):324-34. PubMed ID: 16171204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A signal-detection analysis of eyewitness identification across the adult lifespan.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Wixted JT; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):243-258. PubMed ID: 28504536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Legal actors' and laypersons' utility judgments of eyewitness lineup procedures and outcomes.
    Zimmerman DM; Rodriguez DN
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Apr; 48(2):117-132. PubMed ID: 38602805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.