These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38569842)
1. [Effect of Reducing Fluoroscopy Pulse Rates on Visibility of Devices and Radiation Dose in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention]. Yoshida M; Niwa M; Takahashi Y; Kuratani Y Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2024 May; 80(5):519-529. PubMed ID: 38569842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes. Hansen JW; Foy A; Schmidt T; Ghahramani M; Chambers CE Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 27121130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Nationwide Survey of Medical Radiation Exposure on Cardiovascular Examinations in Japan]. Ishibashi T; Takei Y; Sakamoto H; Yamashita Y; Kato M; Tsukamoto A; Matsumoto K; Mizutani H; Suzuki S; Katoh Y; Chida K Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 31956188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Multicenter Survey on Radiation Dose of Cardiac Intervention]. Hayashi T; Watanabe Y; Imazeki M; Takeda K; Sakiyama K; Hasegawa R; Tajima O; Tsukamoto A; Sato H; Shiraki H; Abe O Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(7):715-724. PubMed ID: 32684564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: relationship with fluoroscopic pulse rate and target vessel. Tanaka T; Matsubara K; Kobayashi S Radiol Phys Technol; 2021 Mar; 14(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 33403510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures: Comparison of Fluoroscopy Dose Indices between the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy Pilot and the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Study. Jones AK; Wunderle KA; Fruscello T; Simanowith M; Cline B; Dharmadhikari S; Duan X; Durack JC; Hirschl D; Kim DS; Mahmood U; Mann SD; Martin C; Metwalli Z; Moirano JM; Neill RA; Newsome J; Padua H; Schoenfeld AH; Miller DL J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2023 Apr; 34(4):556-562.e3. PubMed ID: 36031041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of digital flat-panel detector and conventional angiography machines: evaluation of stent detection rates, visibility scores, and dose-area products. Wiesinger B; Stütz A; Schmehl J; Claussen CD; Wiskirchen J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Apr; 198(4):946-54. PubMed ID: 22451565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Reference Levels for Fluoroscopy-guided Gastrointestinal Procedures in Japan from the REX-GI Study: A Nationwide Multicentre Prospective Observational Study. Hayashi S; Takenaka M; Hosono M; Kogure H; Hasatani K; Suda T; Maruyama H; Matsunaga K; Ihara H; Yoshio T; Nagaike K; Yamada T; Yakushijin T; Takagi T; Tsumura H; Kurita A; Asai S; Ito Y; Kuwai T; Hori Y; Maetani I; Ikezawa K; Iwashita T; Matsumoto K; Fujisawa T; Nishida T Lancet Reg Health West Pac; 2022 Mar; 20():100376. PubMed ID: 35036979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory. Agarwal S; Parashar A; Ellis SG; Heupler FA; Lau E; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 25097198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation exposure in 101 non-coronary fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: reference levels of air kerma at the reference point and air kerma area product. Li X; Hirsch JA; Rehani MM; Yang K; Marschall TA; Liu B Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211108. PubMed ID: 34826249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]